<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>Massively</title>
<link>http://massively.joystiq.com</link>
<description>Massively</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[The Digital Continuum: It won't be World of Warcraft 2]]></title><link>http://massively.joystiq.com/2009/02/14/the-digital-continuum-it-wont-be-world-of-warcraft-2/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://massively.joystiq.com/2009/02/14/the-digital-continuum-it-wont-be-world-of-warcraft-2/</guid><comments>http://massively.joystiq.com/2009/02/14/the-digital-continuum-it-wont-be-world-of-warcraft-2/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://massively.joystiq.com/category/world-of-warcraft/" rel="tag">World of Warcraft</a>, <a href="http://massively.joystiq.com/category/mmo-industry/" rel="tag">MMO industry</a>, <a href="http://massively.joystiq.com/category/opinion/" rel="tag">Opinion</a>, <a href="http://massively.joystiq.com/category/the-digital-continuum/" rel="tag">The Digital Continuum</a></p><div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://massively.joystiq.com/category/the-digital-continuum/"><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/massively.joystiq.com/media/2009/02/35rcopywtyw.jpg" alt="" /></a><br /></div>
I love <a href="http://massively.joystiq.com/tag/Blizzard/">Blizzard</a>, and not just for creating <a href="http://massively.joystiq.com/category/World-of-Warcraft/" style="font-style: italic;">World of Warcraft</a>. I've loved them since they were called Silicon &amp; Synapse and created <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rock_%27n_Roll_Racing" style="font-style: italic;">Rock 'n Roll Racing</a>. But if there's one thing I've learned about the developer, it's that when making games they prefer to improve upon established models more than anything else. That statement may seem to run counter to my title, but stay with me here.<br /><br />When <a href="http://massively.joystiq.com/2009/02/12/jeff-kaplan-leaving-world-of-warcraft-for-next-gen-blizzard-mmo/">Jeff Kaplan announced his move to the company's next-gen MMO,</a> I didn't wonder if <span style="font-style: italic;">World of Warcraft</span> would suffer. I also didn't ponder why Blizzard and Jeff made that choice and if it would mean their second massively multiplayer online entry was going to effective be a sequel to their first. All I considered was which MMOs they were going to pluck ideas from this time, and how cleverly they'd could be implemented.<p><a href="http://massively.joystiq.com/2009/02/14/the-digital-continuum-it-wont-be-world-of-warcraft-2/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>The Digital Continuum: It won't be World of Warcraft 2</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ffffcc;border:1px solid #ffff99;clear:both;"><a href="http://massively.joystiq.com"><img src="http://massively.joystiq.com/media/feedlogo.gif" alt="Massively" style="float:left;padding:0 5px 5px 0;" /></a><a href="http://massively.joystiq.com/2009/02/14/the-digital-continuum-it-wont-be-world-of-warcraft-2/">The Digital Continuum: It won't be World of Warcraft 2</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://massively.joystiq.com">Massively</a> on Sat, 14 Feb 2009 13:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.<br style="clear:both;"></p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://massively.joystiq.com/2009/02/14/the-digital-continuum-it-wont-be-world-of-warcraft-2/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://massively.joystiq.com/forward/1460381/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://massively.joystiq.com/2009/02/14/the-digital-continuum-it-wont-be-world-of-warcraft-2/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>activision-blizzard</category><category>age-of-conan</category><category>arenanet</category><category>blizzard</category><category>featured</category><category>funcom</category><category>god-of-war-3</category><category>guild-wars</category><category>jeff-kaplan</category><category>joystiqfeatures</category><category>ncsoft</category><category>protoss</category><category>rock-n-roll-racing</category><category>street-fighter-iv</category><category>tabula-rasa</category><category>terran</category><category>tigole</category><category>world-of-warcraft</category><category>wow</category><category>wow-2</category><category>zerg</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kyle Horner]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 13:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Blizzard is not even thinking about making World of Warcraft II]]></title><link>http://massively.joystiq.com/2007/11/16/blizzard-is-not-even-thinking-about-making-world-of-warcraft-ii/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://massively.joystiq.com/2007/11/16/blizzard-is-not-even-thinking-about-making-world-of-warcraft-ii/</guid><comments>http://massively.joystiq.com/2007/11/16/blizzard-is-not-even-thinking-about-making-world-of-warcraft-ii/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://massively.joystiq.com/category/world-of-warcraft/" rel="tag">World of Warcraft</a>, <a href="http://massively.joystiq.com/category/fantasy/" rel="tag">Fantasy</a>, <a href="http://massively.joystiq.com/category/news-items/" rel="tag">News items</a></p><a href="http://massively.joystiq.com/category/world-of-warcraft"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/massively.joystiq.com/media/2007/11/wow.jpg" alt="" /></a>If you were hoping the <a href="http://massively.joystiq.com/2007/10/31/blizzard-job-postings-show-progress-on-new-mmo/">next-gen Blizzard MMO</a> currently in development would turn out to be <em>World of Warcraft II</em>, prepare to be disappointed. Blizzard's Frank Pearce <a href="http://www.videogamer.com/news/16-11-2007-6902.html">told videogamer.com</a> that the folks at Blizzard "haven't even started to think about a sequel" to <a href="http://massively.joystiq.com/category/world-of-warcraft"><em>World of Warcraft</em></a>. So, we can knock one potential title off the "could be the next Blizzard MMO" list.<br /><br />We're not surprised. MMO sequels have had an uninspiring past. <a href="http://www.gamespot.com/gamespot/features/pc/graveyard_ultima/"><em>Ultima Worlds Online: Origin</em> was canceled</a> before it even reached the beta testing stage. <a href="http://massively.joystiq.com/category/everquest-ii"><em>EverQuest II</em></a> and <a href="http://massively.joystiq.com/category/lineage-ii"><em>Lineage II</em></a> have both been fairly successful but they've failed to attract anywhere near as many players as their predecessors. There's also the whole "if it ain't broke, don't fix it" thing. <em>World of Warcraft</em> is <a href="http://massively.joystiq.com/2007/11/14/world-of-warcraft-still-growing-9-3-million-served/">still growing</a> in terms of global numbers (though that growth is probably mostly thanks to China). People numbering in the millions across all continents are still playing <em>WoW</em>. It might make sense to make another kind of MMO with a different sort of motif so as to expand your current base, but as for a sequel to <em>WoW</em>; what would be the point of spending millions of dollars to challenge your own throne?<p style="padding:5px;background:#ffffcc;border:1px solid #ffff99;clear:both;"><a href="http://massively.joystiq.com"><img src="http://massively.joystiq.com/media/feedlogo.gif" alt="Massively" style="float:left;padding:0 5px 5px 0;" /></a><a href="http://massively.joystiq.com/2007/11/16/blizzard-is-not-even-thinking-about-making-world-of-warcraft-ii/">Blizzard is not even thinking about making World of Warcraft II</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://massively.joystiq.com">Massively</a> on Fri, 16 Nov 2007 11:01:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.<br style="clear:both;"></p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.videogamer.com/news/16-11-2007-6902.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://massively.joystiq.com/2007/11/16/blizzard-is-not-even-thinking-about-making-world-of-warcraft-ii/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://massively.joystiq.com/forward/1041647/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://massively.joystiq.com/2007/11/16/blizzard-is-not-even-thinking-about-making-world-of-warcraft-ii/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>blizzard</category><category>blizzard-mmo</category><category>breaking</category><category>sequel</category><category>videogamer</category><category>world-of-warcraft</category><category>world-of-warcraft-2</category><category>world-of-warcraft-ii</category><category>wow</category><category>wow-2</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Samuel Axon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 11:01:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
