<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>Massively</title>
<link>http://massively.joystiq.com</link>
<description>Massively</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Taser International vs Linden Lab: Lawsuit dropped!]]></title><link>http://massively.joystiq.com/2009/05/06/taser-international-vs-linden-lab-lawsuit-dropped/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://massively.joystiq.com/2009/05/06/taser-international-vs-linden-lab-lawsuit-dropped/</guid><comments>http://massively.joystiq.com/2009/05/06/taser-international-vs-linden-lab-lawsuit-dropped/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://massively.joystiq.com/category/news-items/" rel="tag">News items</a>, <a href="http://massively.joystiq.com/category/second-life/" rel="tag">Second Life</a>, <a href="http://massively.joystiq.com/category/legal/" rel="tag">Legal</a>, <a href="http://massively.joystiq.com/category/virtual-worlds/" rel="tag">Virtual worlds</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt=""  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/massively.joystiq.com/media/2009/05/legal-taser-vs-linden-lab.jpg" />Quite surprisingly, <a href="http://www.patentarcade.com/2009/05/case-update-taser-v-linden-research.html">according  to Patent Arcade</a>, Taser International Inc have filed to voluntarily drop <a href="http://massively.joystiq.com/2009/04/21/taser-international-vs-linden-lab-crack-den-crackdown/">their  lawsuit against Linden Lab (and numerous others)</a>. It isn't often that we get  to cover the <em>end</em> of a lawsuit -- they generally tend to drag on  somewhat -- but it's possible that this might not be quite over.</p>
<p>Linden Lab hadn't yet filed a response to the original complaint, the suit  can be dropped 'without prejudice'. That means the suit can be filed again.</p>
<p>Perhaps Taser International has found some far more interesting or lucrative  basis for a case. It is also possible that the changes to <em></em><a href="http://secondlife.com/"><em>Second Life</em></a> products that now assert  the primacy of the TASER trademark have satisfied the company. Or perhaps, at  the end of the day, the whole effort met some unknown marketing targets. This  could all be on again. Watch this space.</p>
<hr />
<table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="5" style="border-width: 0pt; margin-top: -10px; margin-bottom: -15px;">
    <tbody>
        <tr>
            <td valign="top" align="right" style="background: rgb(214, 214, 203) none repeat scroll 0% 0%; -moz-background-clip: -moz-initial; -moz-background-origin: -moz-initial; -moz-background-inline-policy: -moz-initial;"><a href="http://massively.joystiq.com/category/second-life/"><img border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/massively.joystiq.com/media/2008/08/tatsignal75.jpg" /></a></td>
            <td style="background: rgb(214, 214, 203) none repeat scroll 0% 0%; -moz-background-clip: -moz-initial; -moz-background-origin: -moz-initial; -moz-background-inline-policy: -moz-initial;"><em>Are you a part of the most widely-known collaborative virtual environment or keeping a close eye on it? Massively's <a href="http://massively.joystiq.com/category/second-life/">Second Life coverage</a> keeps you in the loop.</em></td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
        </tr>
    </tbody>
</table><p style="padding:5px;background:#ffffcc;border:1px solid #ffff99;clear:both;"><a href="http://massively.joystiq.com"><img src="http://massively.joystiq.com/media/feedlogo.gif" alt="Massively" style="float:left;padding:0 5px 5px 0;" /></a><a href="http://massively.joystiq.com/2009/05/06/taser-international-vs-linden-lab-lawsuit-dropped/">Taser International vs Linden Lab: Lawsuit dropped!</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://massively.joystiq.com">Massively</a> on Wed, 06 May 2009 20:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.<br style="clear:both;"></p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://massively.joystiq.com/2009/05/06/taser-international-vs-linden-lab-lawsuit-dropped/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://massively.joystiq.com/forward/1538856/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://massively.joystiq.com/2009/05/06/taser-international-vs-linden-lab-lawsuit-dropped/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>breaking</category><category>legal</category><category>linden-lab</category><category>patent</category><category>patent-arcade</category><category>patent-infringement</category><category>second-life</category><category>taser</category><category>taser-international-inc</category><category>taser-international-versus-linden-lab</category><category>trademark</category><category>trademark-infringement</category><category>virtual-worlds</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tateru Nino]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 20:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Taser International vs Linden Lab: Crack Den crackdown]]></title><link>http://massively.joystiq.com/2009/04/21/taser-international-vs-linden-lab-crack-den-crackdown/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://massively.joystiq.com/2009/04/21/taser-international-vs-linden-lab-crack-den-crackdown/</guid><comments>http://massively.joystiq.com/2009/04/21/taser-international-vs-linden-lab-crack-den-crackdown/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://massively.joystiq.com/category/news-items/" rel="tag">News items</a>, <a href="http://massively.joystiq.com/category/opinion/" rel="tag">Opinion</a>, <a href="http://massively.joystiq.com/category/second-life/" rel="tag">Second Life</a>, <a href="http://massively.joystiq.com/category/legal/" rel="tag">Legal</a>, <a href="http://massively.joystiq.com/category/virtual-worlds/" rel="tag">Virtual worlds</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/massively.joystiq.com/media/2009/04/legal-taser-vs-linden-lab.jpg" alt="" />Taser International Inc have filed a lawsuit against Linden Lab (and others, including some present and some departed) staff. We got a hold of the April 17 complaint yesterday, and have been going through it since then. We've got a summary of the complaint and issues for you, but we won't be linking to the complaint due to the presence of what may be considered to be pornographic images in Exhibit 2. The "crack den" reference in the headline is a recurring phrase in the legal complaint. You'll see why.</p>
<p>If you want the one-sentence summary, Taser seem to have failed to do their homework and basic research, but their case doesn't seem to be entirely without merit either. </p><p><a href="http://massively.joystiq.com/2009/04/21/taser-international-vs-linden-lab-crack-den-crackdown/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Taser International vs Linden Lab: Crack Den crackdown</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ffffcc;border:1px solid #ffff99;clear:both;"><a href="http://massively.joystiq.com"><img src="http://massively.joystiq.com/media/feedlogo.gif" alt="Massively" style="float:left;padding:0 5px 5px 0;" /></a><a href="http://massively.joystiq.com/2009/04/21/taser-international-vs-linden-lab-crack-den-crackdown/">Taser International vs Linden Lab: Crack Den crackdown</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://massively.joystiq.com">Massively</a> on Tue, 21 Apr 2009 11:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.<br style="clear:both;"></p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://massively.joystiq.com/2009/04/21/taser-international-vs-linden-lab-crack-den-crackdown/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://massively.joystiq.com/forward/1523198/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://massively.joystiq.com/2009/04/21/taser-international-vs-linden-lab-crack-den-crackdown/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bill-clinton</category><category>brian-michon</category><category>cyn-skyberg</category><category>dmca</category><category>featured</category><category>frank-ambrose</category><category>gene-yoon</category><category>jay-geeseman</category><category>joe-miller</category><category>john-zdanowski</category><category>legal</category><category>linden-lab</category><category>mark-kingdon</category><category>marty-roberts</category><category>opinion</category><category>patent</category><category>patent-infringement</category><category>philip-rosedale</category><category>rico-act</category><category>roslyn-o-silver</category><category>sandy-gould</category><category>second-life</category><category>taser</category><category>taser-international-inc</category><category>taser-international-versus-linden-lab</category><category>the-crack-den</category><category>the-newman-group</category><category>tom-hale</category><category>tom-swift</category><category>trademark</category><category>trademark-infringement</category><category>victor-appleton</category><category>virtual-worlds</category><category>virtuatrade-llc</category><category>xstreet</category><category>xstreet-sl</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tateru Nino]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 11:00:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
