The three previous round ups corralled 23 questions, dev opinions, and video responses. This fourth edition (not to be dismissed like certain other fourth editions) contains eight more. Do you care about specialty servers, in-game weather, or crafting? Are you burning with a desire to tell the devs exactly how you feel about other players affecting your gameplay? Then there are polls and discussions that you'll want to take part in if you haven't already. One round table even focuses on improving the new player experience. And we've got them all rounded up right here for you.
It's fitting that we're leading off this roundup with the question that governs your gaming experience: Which, if any, specialty servers would you like to see in the games? There's certainly something to be said for having everyone together, but there are also advantages to having servers earmarked for specific playstyles. What's your preference?
- No specialty servers for me!
- Hardcore (for example, permadeath)
- Special Rule Set (for example, No-Trade Restrictions)
The devs: Director of Development Dave Georgeson mirrors the majority of voters, stating, "I admit to liking RP servers. Seems to attract friendlier people for some reason. I have fun there." Senior Producer Terry Michaels is on the opposite side of the spectrum, siding with the least popular vote: "I am drawn to Special Rule Sets. Unique situations with great challenges are cool.
25. In Landmark, what kind of building do you think you'll participate in?
This next question is definitely very centered on one of the two games, and it's not EQN. If all things are ideal (especially finding all the perfect resources!), would you be more opt to go off and build by yourself, or is the creation process something you'd undergo with friends and guildmates?
- Small Group
- Large Group/Guilds
- Massive/Open Community
- Any or all types of building - solo or group
The devs: Lead Game Designer Darrin McPherson fits right in with the crowd, stating, "I will participate in all to some degree but lean toward small group." Senior Art Director Rosie Rappaport expressed her preference for social building as well, saying, "Building with friends is always funnest for me!"
26. In Landmark, to what degree should you be able to negatively affect other players' gameplay?
Now here's a touchy subject: You're trotting along, gaming it up, when another player crosses your path -- should said stranger in that chance encounter have the ability to really affect your gameplay? And what about all your friends you deal with on a more regular basis? The options delve a lot deeper than just yes or no here.
- Never/Not at all!
- Only people on my friends list in limited ways.
- Only people on my friends list, but in significant/game-altering ways.
- Everyone, all the time, but only in minor ways.
- I want to be able to cause death and destruction!
The devs: Creative Director Jeff Butler actually admits that some of his personal leanings are suppressed for the good of the whole: "My inner griefer will hate me for this, but never."
Technical Director Steve Klug takes a moderate approach, saying, "Limited to those that haven't opted in. But I'd like to see at least temporary negative effects for those that have." And McPherson's reply is just too good not to include: "Only ever consensually. Opt-in mayhem would be fun." [italics added]
Lest you think EQ Next was lost in all the talk about Landmark, this next question is strictly about that future sandbox. It boils down to whether or not players want to a single character to learn all there is to know about crafting. This may seem like a no-brainer to some, but remember that the devs want to encourage the social aspect (the actually MM in MMO) of the game as well. Where does your opinion fall?
- Yes! I don't want to have to create alts just to do other types of crafting.
- Yes. If I can unlock all adventure classes on one character, then I should be able to unlock all crafting types.
- No, I think it's more interesting if I have to choose which type of crafting to specialize in.
- I don't want to see different crafting types or classes at all. Let crafting just be one thing available to all.
The devs: Rappaport chimed in with her thoughts, saying, "Socialization should be highly encouraged and rewarded, but not required." Klug followed these same sentiments: "Dependency between players is good, but soloing should be possible if you put in the time. I say learn all classes!"
28. Would you like there to be an impact from weather/seasons in Landmark?
Since I've asked this very question in various formats like The Stream Team, you can tell it's one that truly interests me personally. And while having a dynamic system that changes visually is pretty much enjoyed by everyone across the board, how do folks feel about weather that can have serious gameplay effects?
- Yes, this would add to the immersion. Plus, it would just be awesome!
- Not an impact, but seeing changes (superficially) would be cool.
- No, I don't want to see visible changes to weather or seasons.
- I'm not sure.
The devs: Butler made his thoughts known with the statement, "I love weather effects, adding seasonal changes would be awesome!" Rappaport, while agreeing with that sentiment, also included a little extra food for thought. "This would be way cool and dynamic and fun. I'd also like events tied to weather changes," she opined.
These final three round tables, and presumably all future ones, sport a new format; instead of various devs voicing their opinions about the topic at hand, one dev does a miniblog explaining the question more in-depth and why it's being asked.
With no NDA on the alpha, players have been free to share their creations on all forms of media, from Twitter to forums to livestreams. That's given those who are waiting for the beta or release plenty of chances to get a taste of what's possible. And there's no denying that some of these creations are simply astounding! That brings us to the building contests that devs have talked about since way back when. What exactly do players want to see be born from voxels in these competitions?
- EQ/EQII Building Homages
- Architecture for the new Norrath (EQN)
- Genre-Specific Contest -- Modern
- Genre-Specific Contest -- Sci-Fi
- Genre-Specific Contest -- Fantasy (not necessarily Norrath)
Georgeson's remarks: Kicking off the new format, Georgeson asked simply, "Where do we go from here?" One idea is building contests, which are a handy way to emphasize the features that are already in game (versus those features that are still MIA).
30. What do you think would most improve a new user's experience?
There's just no getting around it: A player's first experience in a game can be a make-or-break situation. So how do devs, who've been immersed in the game so long that they couldn't pretend to be a new user if they tried, get a feel for that all-important newbie experience? Why, you ask all the recent newbies, of course!
- More character customization options
- Better and more clear controls for character and camera
- Clear, established goals for your first few minutes of play
- Easier to identify resources and improvements to crafting
- Refinement of building tools
McPherson's remarks: The lead game designer laid it on the line; devs are so immersed in the game (and have been for quite some time) that they simply can't experience things as a new user would. For this reason, player input is especially ideal.
The latest round table made an appearance just a couple of days ago, focusing on which building tool needed more attention first. Players have expressed a deep desire for more precise tools, but which tool has priority in the public's mind?
- Line Tool
- Selection Volume
- Smooth Tool
- Shaped Blocks
Building and UI Lead Jake Sones' says the devs understand that the building tools are integral to Landmark, and he explained that there are indeed solutions in the works for certain issues. In fact, there's a "tweak mode" in development to ensure that voxels can be manipulated in the same manner as props, meaning that things can be adjusted after placement.