| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Joystiq, and more

Reader Comments (38)

Posted: Jan 31st 2012 11:02PM kimowar said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Since it requires no maintenace why not keep the server up as it is. P2w is killing this genre

Posted: Feb 1st 2012 12:16AM Maseno said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@kimowar

How are any of the recent Subscription game conversions to free to play "Pay to Win"?
Reply

Posted: Jan 31st 2012 11:20PM Jenks said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Truly a shame. I almost bought a mac just to play on this server a few years back. Why don't they understand that there's no interest in what they call Everquest now, people want to play the EQ from 1999-2004.

Posted: Jan 31st 2012 11:27PM Yellowdancer said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Jenks

You might be on to something! Which is why they created the progression server with the original rule set.
Reply

Posted: Feb 1st 2012 12:19AM Maseno said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Jenks

Go play on a private server. There are a ton out there with healthy populations. Can find ones that only go up to certain expansions as well.
Reply

Posted: Feb 1st 2012 6:36PM Jenks said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Yellowdancer

The progression server doesn't have the original ruleset, it has the original set of content with the same rules as every other server.

@ Maseno

I play on project 1999 from time to time. It's fun, but it's not the same as if it was official. Trying to get friends to install the right version and tweak the config files to connect is also a tall order.
Reply

Posted: Feb 1st 2012 2:55AM kimowar said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Simple. Anytime a game gives an unfair advantage to those willing to buy items such as exp potions, stat items, skill unlocks, larger pack space et etc. Makes for an unbalanced gameplay among players,
Reply

Posted: Feb 1st 2012 2:16AM Amusednow said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
News flash, Mac people too cheap and dumb to buy a lowend Windows based system to play EQ that has only been out since 1999/2003. But hey go stand in line for the next overpriced unit for a slicked over unix install and pay out the nose.

Posted: Feb 1st 2012 5:56AM Cyroselle said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
@Amusednow Newsflash. Those same people could easily bootcamp Windows, and likely do so for other games.

It was stated earlier that the reason they like the mac client is that it's about as close to classic EQ as you're likely to get outside of a private server.
Reply

Posted: Feb 1st 2012 3:39AM CaseyTheBrash said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
So ten people are upset?

Posted: Feb 1st 2012 7:53AM Balraw said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Nice to see that the massively readers are mature enough not to rag on people who make a different choice in computer hardware to them
.
.
.
oh wait! ...... Le sigh

Posted: Feb 1st 2012 8:50AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
One of the best decisions I ever made was to buy a Mac. I have saved so much money over the years not buying games, because they were unavailable without bootcamp, and I refuse to put Windows on my machine.

I can play every Blizzard game, I played WAR for a long time and I have played CoH for years and even EQ Mac I re-sub for every once in a while.

All of the other recent MMOs like Rift, Star Wars, Conan, etc. I probably would have bought and sunk money into. Lots of money saved, I am not complaining.

Posted: Feb 1st 2012 12:52PM Krig said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@(Unverified) Mac machines cost alot more than a computer windows based. Your argument is invalid.
Reply

Posted: Feb 1st 2012 9:05AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
It would be neat if they spent the money and converted this over as well as making the same 'old school' available for PC, but I can understand the costs involved on such an undertaking.

Hopefully they will sink money into Vanguard, that is a game I would definitely play if it went F2P.

Posted: Feb 1st 2012 9:59AM Miffy said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Funny how they only have one person who understands the code and yet the Project 1999 guys are fine lol.

Posted: Feb 1st 2012 3:29PM HereticalPenguin said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Miffy The guys that run the P99 server are emulating the classic game with more recent clients from three or four expansions ago. It's not the same deal.
Reply

Posted: Feb 1st 2012 10:43AM drakino said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'd like to see SOE take the Mac more seriously. EQ Mac was a joke, since it separated the player base. You weren't an EQ player, you were a Windows player of a Mac player. If you happened to own both (like a Windows desktop and a Mac laptop), you lacked the ability to just play on one world with either platform.

Blizzard, and now Valve do things really right. Day and day Mac/PC releases, on the same servers. Portal 2 was nice since I could play it on my laptop, or on my gaming PC. Didn't matter. Above the platform choice, I am a gamer first.

Why bash someones choice of a platform? All that does is push people out of the community, vs having more gamers to play with. Choice is a good thing.

Posted: Feb 2nd 2012 4:07AM Lionhearted said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The brilliant thing about the Mac server was that it was basically the original version of the game in its glory days -- up until the Planes of Power expansion. Most of the rest of the expansions weren't anywhere near as good as those original three and the original game. It was like a small piece of gaming history.

I wish companies like SOE would decide to just open source something like that, so long as it's not for profit. I don't think it would hurt game sales at all, even if a port of the current version of the game was made for Macs. If anything, it would only serve to spur further interest in the current game.

Featured Stories

Engadget

Engadget

Joystiq

Joystiq

WoW Insider

WoW

TUAW

TUAW