In case you were worried about a lack of new and accessible MMOs coming down the pike over the next couple of years, the king of casual is riding to the rescue. At least, that's what an analyst at Sterne Agee hinted at on Gamasutra recently.
Arvind Bhatia is quoted on the game industry website as saying that Blizzard's product pipeline includes "expansion packs for StarCraft and World of Warcraft, a new Diablo game, [and] a new casual MMO." That casual MMO is of course Titan, the secretive WoW followup that has reportedly gobbled up Blizzard's most experienced designers.
While no one outside of Blizzard has any inkling as to Titan's setting, mechanics, or target audience, Bhatia's prediction makes a certain amount of sense given the realities of the MMO marketplace and the costs inherent in developing and marketing AAA titles. Head to Gamasutra for the full report.
Reader Comments (99)
Posted: Jun 29th 2011 8:37PM DevilSei said
It does make sense. They seem to be pushing a bit of a more hardcore thing with WoW, with Firelands trash being brutal little buggers. And well... if you want some easy money, nothing screams cash like a casual game! It worked for the Wii at least.
Posted: Jun 30th 2011 4:08AM Lt Cobalt said
@DevilSei
Brutal? How long have you been playing WoW?
That place is far from hardcore, maybe more so on heroic but that place is a joke, my guild have cleared half the instance already and with no PTR testing or anything like that. No, casual is exactly where they are heading at Blizzard, confirming it for Titan makes me even less interested in whatever it turns out to be, in recent years i've not been impressed with Blizzards development on WoW, so i don't hold much faith that i'd enjoy another MMO they sqeeze out.
Reply
Brutal? How long have you been playing WoW?
That place is far from hardcore, maybe more so on heroic but that place is a joke, my guild have cleared half the instance already and with no PTR testing or anything like that. No, casual is exactly where they are heading at Blizzard, confirming it for Titan makes me even less interested in whatever it turns out to be, in recent years i've not been impressed with Blizzards development on WoW, so i don't hold much faith that i'd enjoy another MMO they sqeeze out.
Posted: Jun 30th 2011 6:27AM (Unverified) said
@DevilSei WoW is casual as well. All is casual...
Reply
Posted: Jun 30th 2011 12:21PM (Unverified) said
@DevilSei I agree if they are smart they'll make the game feel more like Wrath; I still feel burned by what they pulled with Cata. Good thing Rift came when it did.
Reply
Posted: Jun 29th 2011 8:42PM Royalkin said
While I don't look towards Blizzard for my MMO enjoyment, however this makes me sad because it's even more evidence that sandbox MMOs are becoming even less economically viable. The only choices left are Eve and Earthrise. The former is moving towards the casual environment, and the latter is just plain horrible.
I guess I'll either find myself bored more often, or start watching a lot more television.
I guess I'll either find myself bored more often, or start watching a lot more television.
Posted: Jun 29th 2011 9:12PM xenothaulus said
@Royalkin The problem with most sandbox MMOs, and EVE in particular in my experience, is most of the players are just in it to throw sand at each other.
Reply
Posted: Jun 29th 2011 9:24PM Joshua Przygocki said
@Royalkin You're forgetting:
-Ryzom(I'm pretty sure it's sandbox)
-Runescape(sorta)
-That Mech Game... (I just played it not too long ago, can't remember it's name for the life of me.)
-Wurm
-Second Life(I think it's an MMO, and it's pretty sandboxish.)
-That Post-Apocalyptic MMO(Who's title is also fleeting my memory.)
-That other Post-Apocalyptic MMO(Fallen Earth, I'm pretty sure it's at least sorta sandboxish.)
-Minecraft, if you consider it an MMO(It isn't.)
-Terraria(Sorta sandboxish, also not really an MMO; I mean really, calling a game an MMO just because it has a lot of players and is online doesn't make it an MMO. That's like calling Call of Duty an FPS/RPG/RTS because it involves some strategy executed in real time and you are playing the role of a soldier while shooting things from a first person perspective.)
I'm sure there are more. Some of these are semi new, and some are obviously more sandboxish than others.
Reply
-Ryzom(I'm pretty sure it's sandbox)
-Runescape(sorta)
-That Mech Game... (I just played it not too long ago, can't remember it's name for the life of me.)
-Wurm
-Second Life(I think it's an MMO, and it's pretty sandboxish.)
-That Post-Apocalyptic MMO(Who's title is also fleeting my memory.)
-That other Post-Apocalyptic MMO(Fallen Earth, I'm pretty sure it's at least sorta sandboxish.)
-Minecraft, if you consider it an MMO(It isn't.)
-Terraria(Sorta sandboxish, also not really an MMO; I mean really, calling a game an MMO just because it has a lot of players and is online doesn't make it an MMO. That's like calling Call of Duty an FPS/RPG/RTS because it involves some strategy executed in real time and you are playing the role of a soldier while shooting things from a first person perspective.)
I'm sure there are more. Some of these are semi new, and some are obviously more sandboxish than others.
Posted: Jun 29th 2011 9:39PM DevilSei said
@Joshua Przygocki
To be fair, I've had this argument before but RPG being "about playing a role" is rather subjective. In terms of progression based gameplay based around gaining experience to gain levels and use better equipment and abilities, Call of Duty (and subsequent games using experience) could be called at least an RPG-lite styled game.
In that case, Call of duty could be considered a hybrid of heavy FPS gameplay with some RPG elements. It also does combat balancing between levels a hell of a lot more fairly than Earthrise. But again that would be an unfair comparison in the first place.
Reply
To be fair, I've had this argument before but RPG being "about playing a role" is rather subjective. In terms of progression based gameplay based around gaining experience to gain levels and use better equipment and abilities, Call of Duty (and subsequent games using experience) could be called at least an RPG-lite styled game.
In that case, Call of duty could be considered a hybrid of heavy FPS gameplay with some RPG elements. It also does combat balancing between levels a hell of a lot more fairly than Earthrise. But again that would be an unfair comparison in the first place.
Posted: Jun 29th 2011 9:45PM Joshua Przygocki said
@DevilSei That's my point. RPG LITERALLY means Role Playing Game, just as MMO LITERALLY means Massively Multiplayer Online. RPGs have more than just role playing a character though, you have character progression and customization of some sort. Just like an MMO is more than an online game with a lot of players, it would need to have persistence and a world within the game along with player interaction.
Reply
Posted: Jun 30th 2011 9:42AM mrdryden said
@Royalkin Don't forget ArcheAge! If it's even half as good as the devs ambitious plans are for it, it'll be a hell of a sandbox.
http://archeage-online.com/
http://www.archeage.com/en
Ok, that's my limit for proselytizing for the month.
Reply
http://archeage-online.com/
http://www.archeage.com/en
Ok, that's my limit for proselytizing for the month.
Posted: Jun 29th 2011 8:49PM ultimateq said
It's an mmo for females. It will cater to women looking for an engaging online game that speaks to us. It will feature episodic content, unique shopping experiences, high fashion, art design, and intimate encounters, all in a tropical island setting.
And if you don't get the reference, well that's your loss. :)
And if you don't get the reference, well that's your loss. :)
Posted: Jun 29th 2011 8:50PM Allegos said
We'll see. The veteran designers working on Titan are the people who designed Burning Crusade, not the people who replaced old Azeroth with busted vehicle UI's, undertuned world Elites, and quests to be the sidekick while one of Metzen's characters has an adventure.
Hopefully something substantial will come out of this year's Blizzcon, even if it's just a skeleton to hang our speculations on. Being in the dark gets tiresome after a while.
Hopefully something substantial will come out of this year's Blizzcon, even if it's just a skeleton to hang our speculations on. Being in the dark gets tiresome after a while.
Posted: Jul 3rd 2011 5:39AM SgtBaker1234556 said
@Allegos
tigole (Jeff Kaplan) is supposed to be the lead designer.. whatcouldpossiblygowrong?!?!
WoW has been so much better off ever since he stepped down, good riddance. I've no interest in Titan, it's going to be grindy gearfest as all his other designs.
Reply
tigole (Jeff Kaplan) is supposed to be the lead designer.. whatcouldpossiblygowrong?!?!
WoW has been so much better off ever since he stepped down, good riddance. I've no interest in Titan, it's going to be grindy gearfest as all his other designs.
Posted: Jun 29th 2011 8:50PM (Unverified) said
@JohnLane
Your illiterate nonsense isn't funny and incredibly annoying in every single post you make. Is there anyway to ignore a users posts? NOTHING this guy posts is worth donkey spit.
Your illiterate nonsense isn't funny and incredibly annoying in every single post you make. Is there anyway to ignore a users posts? NOTHING this guy posts is worth donkey spit.
Posted: Jun 29th 2011 8:52PM Allegos said
ETA: The source quoted in the article is not a Blizzard employee. He's guessing from the outside, just like the rest of us.











