Tired of the same old same old in your favorite MMO? Looking for something else to do? Well, if you're one of a particular breed of players, you might try out setting some self-imposed limitations on your leveling. In World of Warcraft, several players have tried their hands at different methods. Gutrot from the EU leveled to 70 wearing only a loincloth. Gweryc decided to run his hunter as a melee-only character. Noor the Pacifist then decided to level his character to 70 by not killing any mobs at all, and he only did quests that involved non-violent criteria (like FedEx quests).
Now we hear that another player has upped the alternative-leveling ante by not questing at all. Everbloom, level 85 Night Elf Restoration Druid from the Feathermoon server, leveled all the way to 85 by grinding exploration and gathering experience! While Everbloom's armory profile shows that the character entered one five-man dungeon at some point, there is only one completed quest -- and Everbloom explained that one was a fluke. Apparently Blizzard blindsided her by granting a quest completion for simply reading an Argent Tournament invitation letter -- even without having a quest for it. Everbloom additionally managed to level to 85 while only dying 25 times in total (once to falling), making this crazy stunt an even more impressive feat.
If you'd like to read more about it directly from the source, head over to the World of Warcraft forums and check out Feathermoon's leveling thread. It's certainly worth a look if you've ever thought about trying some form of self-imposed limitation leveling in your MMO of choice.
Reader Comments (61)
Posted: Apr 11th 2011 12:37PM wcarnation said
So why does Massively news appear on Joystiq but Big Download only gets summaries?
Posted: Apr 11th 2011 12:41PM (Unverified) said
@wcarnation
Would you like some cheese with that whine?
Reply
Would you like some cheese with that whine?
Posted: Apr 12th 2011 6:50PM Brianna Royce said
@wcarnation I can't tell you about Big Download's site policies and coding because I don't know, but when Massively's got a post that Joystiq's peeps would like, we cross-post it over there and share the love. :) Eliot recently answered a similar question in Ask Massively: http://massively.joystiq.com/2011/03/31/ask-massively-the-actual-most-wonderful-time-of-the-year-editio/
-Bree
Reply
-Bree
Posted: Apr 11th 2011 12:41PM b3n said
Yeah "conduct" systems should be built into more games.
The game should reward players for playing with self-imposed restrictions.
Even the ancient and legendary NetHack has this kind of thing!
The game should reward players for playing with self-imposed restrictions.
Even the ancient and legendary NetHack has this kind of thing!
Posted: Apr 11th 2011 12:43PM Carolina said
I recall doing lvl 84 to 85 just gathering on a druid, was fun.
Posted: Apr 11th 2011 12:44PM Raffi256 said
Never got into WoW, it always felt like a front-end to a SQL database.
Posted: Apr 11th 2011 12:47PM DasMadHatter said
Precisely why I stopped playing this game.
Posted: Apr 11th 2011 12:56PM (Unverified) said
@DasMadHatter
Because there's an alternate route to the level cap? Seriously? What?
Reply
Because there's an alternate route to the level cap? Seriously? What?
Posted: Apr 11th 2011 4:55PM LEONLEONLEON said
@Tempes Magus I wish they would apply this to alot more games.
Even first person shooters. "go collect this stuff" but without actually needing to kill everything you see.
Reply
Even first person shooters. "go collect this stuff" but without actually needing to kill everything you see.
Posted: Apr 11th 2011 12:50PM eatmewhileirot said
Think now is the time to go outside...
Posted: Apr 11th 2011 12:55PM Ezio Auditore da Firenze said
@eatmewhileirot
You're commenting on an MMO blog on the internet. It wouldn't hurt you to get a little sun, as well. ;)
Reply
You're commenting on an MMO blog on the internet. It wouldn't hurt you to get a little sun, as well. ;)
Posted: Apr 11th 2011 1:01PM eatmewhileirot said
@Ezio Auditore da Firenze I read it on the main Joystiq page, but got re-directed to the 'massively' page when I wanted to comment. ;o
Reply











