Child's Play has become the ubiquitous ur-charity for the gaming community. Founded by Mike Krahulik and Jerry Holkins of Penny Arcade fame, it's grown into a multinational event for gamers the world over to help out needy children. It's also made a tradition out of breaking records for overall donations every year, and this year is no exception, with the total amount raised coming out to over $2 million for the year and nearly $9 million over its lifetime.
The record-breaking effort has always been helped by enterprising fundraisers from the community, and the MMO community is no exception; notable fundraising efforts this year include the Lord of the Rings Online-inspired fundraiser from A Casual Stroll to Mordor and Sony Online Entertainment's donations for the purchase of in-game pets, together with other non-MMO events such as the infamous Desert Bus for Hope marathon and the Humble Indie Bundle. The entire gaming community, online or off, can take pride in another record-breaking year for Child's Play.
Reader Comments (7)
Posted: Jan 4th 2011 5:14AM JoeH42 said
9 million dollars over it's lifetime. Hmm, that's almost 1/17th? the amount of money gamers spend on WoW each month. So should gamers really be patting themselves on the back? I'm not trying to be some sort of killjoy or downplay how much good that 9 million dollars can do but it's embarrassing when you compare it to how much money people are spending to entertain themselves on a weekly basis. And that's just too bad and not a statistic that I'll take pride in.
Posted: Jan 4th 2011 7:39AM Eamil said
@JoeH42 "I'm not trying to be some sort of killjoy"
Yes you are. But it's okay. I've got enough pride in that figure for both of us. While it would be nice for charities to be about giving every dollar you can spare instead of wasting it on frivolities like "movies" and "vidjya games," realistically speaking they're not and I don't think it's fair to judge their success by that standard.
Reply
Yes you are. But it's okay. I've got enough pride in that figure for both of us. While it would be nice for charities to be about giving every dollar you can spare instead of wasting it on frivolities like "movies" and "vidjya games," realistically speaking they're not and I don't think it's fair to judge their success by that standard.
Posted: Jan 4th 2011 10:15AM ScottishViking said
@JoeH42 "I'm not trying to be some sort of killjoy"
Yes you are
^ this
Also, this figure is all the more impressive given that Child's Play has tapped into an otherwise impenetrable demographic as far as charitable donations are concerned: young people (18-35) with credit cards. THAT is the real victory here -- awakening a huge percentage of the population, many of whom do not vote or give money to charity, to give to those in need. A lot of those given (myself included) don't have that much to give. But Child's Play, and all their affiliated partners (I donated through Humble Indie Bundle), have found a way to access us. That's a big deal.
Yes you are
^ this
Also, this figure is all the more impressive given that Child's Play has tapped into an otherwise impenetrable demographic as far as charitable donations are concerned: young people (18-35) with credit cards. THAT is the real victory here -- awakening a huge percentage of the population, many of whom do not vote or give money to charity, to give to those in need. A lot of those given (myself included) don't have that much to give. But Child's Play, and all their affiliated partners (I donated through Humble Indie Bundle), have found a way to access us. That's a big deal.
Posted: Jan 4th 2011 4:50PM JoeH42 said
@ScottishViking
"awakening a huge percentage of the population"
Are you trying to be funny? They apparently awoke a tiny fraction of that population. I'm all for them trying and succeeding at their objective but let's call a spade a spade, by and large we're donating a very small amount of our money compared to how much we spend on our entertainment. You know how much money Call of Duty: Black Ops made in it's first week of sales? Couple hundred million last I heard and that was just in it's first week and is just a single video game. So while Child's Play may have "awakened" a few people, all the video game companies have lulled the rest into a nice complacent sleep in a far more effective manner.
But that is great that you donated what you could. As for myself, this is the first I've ever heard of this charity or any of it's affiliates until I happened to notice this article on massively. Mind you, I was the first one to comment on it vs. the 80+ comments on the article about massively's player choice awards so we once again see where everyone's priorities lie. But maybe if the video game companies had worked as hard at encouraging their players to go contribute towards this charity as they worked to encourage players to vote for them to win various awards, then people might actual know about this sort of thing and pitch in a few dollars before going down to the store to buy some more cigarettes and junk food.
Reply
"awakening a huge percentage of the population"
Are you trying to be funny? They apparently awoke a tiny fraction of that population. I'm all for them trying and succeeding at their objective but let's call a spade a spade, by and large we're donating a very small amount of our money compared to how much we spend on our entertainment. You know how much money Call of Duty: Black Ops made in it's first week of sales? Couple hundred million last I heard and that was just in it's first week and is just a single video game. So while Child's Play may have "awakened" a few people, all the video game companies have lulled the rest into a nice complacent sleep in a far more effective manner.
But that is great that you donated what you could. As for myself, this is the first I've ever heard of this charity or any of it's affiliates until I happened to notice this article on massively. Mind you, I was the first one to comment on it vs. the 80+ comments on the article about massively's player choice awards so we once again see where everyone's priorities lie. But maybe if the video game companies had worked as hard at encouraging their players to go contribute towards this charity as they worked to encourage players to vote for them to win various awards, then people might actual know about this sort of thing and pitch in a few dollars before going down to the store to buy some more cigarettes and junk food.
Posted: Jan 4th 2011 9:56PM ScottishViking said
@JoeH42
Good grief, are you for real? OK, I'll take the troll-bait. (I've written my will on my jeans, and I'm ready to take the plunge.)
Millions of dollars a year are raised for charity by ONE organization -- yes, that's ONE organization -- and all of a sudden the world is filled with miserable creeps and selfish wankers? What a cauldron of despair you must inhabit.
As you say, "let's call a spade a spade." You, like me, probably live in a Western country, in a capitalist society. The system is propped up by people spending. Most of the time -- 99% of the time -- people spend more on themselves then they do on others. Fact. It isn't perfect and a lot of the time it isn't pretty. And sure, charity isn't a solution to these problems.
But it's better than the alternative, which is doing nothing. Which, in a way, is what you are suggesting.
No, wait, you're suggesting that people give most of their money to charity. Well, that would be nice, wouldn't it? Point me to a western democracy where that happens and I'll happily follow suit.
So are you a utopian or a whiner? Sometimes I can't tell the two apart. I'm going to hazard a guess and say that this is an "ongoing philosophical issue" with you -- living in the kind of society we do.
So why then take it out on the happy news that Child's Play has raised millions of dollars? What have YOU done that is so much ethically superior? That is an honest question. If you have done something, unheralded by the world, that has contributed more than Mike and Jerry at Penny Arcade, we all need to know about it.
PS: The fact you haven't heard of Child's Play before makes it hard to take your comments very seriously. Where have you BEEN for the past few years? It's only been the biggest news in video game-related charity in, well, forever. I would guess you don't follow "charitable news" that avidly.
Reply
Good grief, are you for real? OK, I'll take the troll-bait. (I've written my will on my jeans, and I'm ready to take the plunge.)
Millions of dollars a year are raised for charity by ONE organization -- yes, that's ONE organization -- and all of a sudden the world is filled with miserable creeps and selfish wankers? What a cauldron of despair you must inhabit.
As you say, "let's call a spade a spade." You, like me, probably live in a Western country, in a capitalist society. The system is propped up by people spending. Most of the time -- 99% of the time -- people spend more on themselves then they do on others. Fact. It isn't perfect and a lot of the time it isn't pretty. And sure, charity isn't a solution to these problems.
But it's better than the alternative, which is doing nothing. Which, in a way, is what you are suggesting.
No, wait, you're suggesting that people give most of their money to charity. Well, that would be nice, wouldn't it? Point me to a western democracy where that happens and I'll happily follow suit.
So are you a utopian or a whiner? Sometimes I can't tell the two apart. I'm going to hazard a guess and say that this is an "ongoing philosophical issue" with you -- living in the kind of society we do.
So why then take it out on the happy news that Child's Play has raised millions of dollars? What have YOU done that is so much ethically superior? That is an honest question. If you have done something, unheralded by the world, that has contributed more than Mike and Jerry at Penny Arcade, we all need to know about it.
PS: The fact you haven't heard of Child's Play before makes it hard to take your comments very seriously. Where have you BEEN for the past few years? It's only been the biggest news in video game-related charity in, well, forever. I would guess you don't follow "charitable news" that avidly.
Posted: Jan 10th 2011 4:49PM JoeH42 said
@ScottishViking I've been playing several MMOs solidly for the last 6 years and have never heard of Child's Play. It's not the fault of Child's Play that I haven't heard of them it's just a little depressing they don't get better advertising or coverage or whatever you want to call it.
As for myself, I do lots of stuff for and with charity. My finances prevent me from giving as much money as I'd like to be able to, but I use a good portion of my time to help others around me. But I don't do it so I can be hailed as some wonderful person nor do I care to boast about it.
In any case, I just noticed the article about Cataclysm selling 4.7 million copies in one month and it made me remember this article. So I'll just return to my original point, while this is wonderful news that Child's Play managed to raise over 2 million this year, to me it only serves to highlight how much people could be doing vs. how much they do. We wouldn't go around bragging about a police detective that solves one homicide a year and leaves another fifty unsolved. It's all just a matter of degree.
Reply
As for myself, I do lots of stuff for and with charity. My finances prevent me from giving as much money as I'd like to be able to, but I use a good portion of my time to help others around me. But I don't do it so I can be hailed as some wonderful person nor do I care to boast about it.
In any case, I just noticed the article about Cataclysm selling 4.7 million copies in one month and it made me remember this article. So I'll just return to my original point, while this is wonderful news that Child's Play managed to raise over 2 million this year, to me it only serves to highlight how much people could be doing vs. how much they do. We wouldn't go around bragging about a police detective that solves one homicide a year and leaves another fifty unsolved. It's all just a matter of degree.
Posted: Jan 4th 2011 4:40PM JoeH42 said
It's not "their success" that's the problem, it's our failures. But this kind of attitude goes on all the time so I suppose it's pointless for me to get angry about it. When Haiti got hit by that hurricane a while ago everyone rushed to help them out, forgetting that they've been starving to death and lacking even mediocre medical services for years and that we've never done much to help them before. And now that our conscience has been assuaged we've gone right back to ignoring them. And all the celebrities can feel great for taking a few hours to partcipate in a fund raiser and can go back to spending the entire rest of their life focusing on themselves.
The simple fact of the matter is that it is well within our capabilities to make sure that every single person in the world has food and clean water and the basic needs of life. But no one cares. We'll just keep spending our resources on getting our cat a kidney transplant, gastric bypass operations because we've got so much food we can't control ourselves, and yes, frivolities like movies and vidjya games. And you can feel tons of pride in that figure and donate a can of soup to your local food bank and sleep well at night knowing that you've done your best.
Oh, and people can keep voting my comment down because they don't want to be reminded of the truth.
The simple fact of the matter is that it is well within our capabilities to make sure that every single person in the world has food and clean water and the basic needs of life. But no one cares. We'll just keep spending our resources on getting our cat a kidney transplant, gastric bypass operations because we've got so much food we can't control ourselves, and yes, frivolities like movies and vidjya games. And you can feel tons of pride in that figure and donate a can of soup to your local food bank and sleep well at night knowing that you've done your best.
Oh, and people can keep voting my comment down because they don't want to be reminded of the truth.










