Tweet Private game servers are a controversial, often hushed topic in gaming circles. Some gamers enjoy the fee-free nature of private servers, while others use these forbidden realms to experience the MMO in a different state than the live game (for example, playing on a "classic" private server that doesn't allow for expansion packs). No matter what the reason, game companies tend to frown on such activities. Last week, Blizzard frowned at a particular private server and was awarded $88,000,000 for the effort.
In October 2009, Blizzard filed a suit against Alyson Reeves, owner of Scapegaming and a private World of Warcraft server. Reeves was making a profit from the enterprise, using microtransactions on the server. The judge ruled that this was indeed copyright infringement against Blizzard, and ordered Scapegaming to pay $85.5M in statutory damages, $3M in inappropriate profits, and $63,600 in attorney fees. Reeves may appeal the suit at this point.
As with the bnetd case, Blizzard is sending a clear message to people trying to mess with their code: don't. Scapegaming's Facebook page isn't exactly overflowing with support for the company, and we can imagine that many private server operators are thinking long and hard about whether the risk is worth it this week.
Reader Comments (72)
Posted: Aug 16th 2010 6:19PM Eamil said
"For those of you cheering this on, remember that your sub fees went to this lawsuit (crime or no crime) as opposed to getting Cataclysm done."
Did you happen to notice the part where some of the amount awarded to Blizzard was specifically intended to cover legal fees?
Reply
Did you happen to notice the part where some of the amount awarded to Blizzard was specifically intended to cover legal fees?
Posted: Aug 16th 2010 7:18PM wjowski said
"For those of you cheering this on, remember that your sub fees went to this lawsuit (crime or no crime) as opposed to getting Cataclysm done."
Are you implying that they set aside money for some sort of...legal department?
Gosh that sounds like *every business in the history of forever and ever*.
Reply
Are you implying that they set aside money for some sort of...legal department?
Gosh that sounds like *every business in the history of forever and ever*.
Posted: Aug 17th 2010 12:49AM (Unverified) said
For those of you cheering this on, remember that your sub fees went to this lawsuit (crime or no crime) as opposed to getting Cataclysm done.
This is Blizzard, not NCSoft. I stopped reading your post.
Reply
This is Blizzard, not NCSoft. I stopped reading your post.
Posted: Aug 17th 2010 2:57AM Vagrant Zero said
You spent that much time writing out your garbage yet you couldn't be bothered to read the damned article? They RECOVERED their attorney fees which were a measly 63,000 USD to begin with.
Reply
Posted: Aug 17th 2010 10:33AM (Unverified) said
LOL Are you saying Blizz can't simultaneously sue someone and develop an expansion? WTF Do you think Blizz is, Funcom? These guys have more money that the US GDP. They could buy most countries with their money and not notice the loss. Oh yeah, they've been working on Starcraft II and Diablo III while suing this person as well. Damn those guys are some multitaskers.
Reply
Posted: Aug 16th 2010 4:15PM (Unverified) said
So basically, someone pirates their server and they get away with enough to make StarCraft 2? I highly doubt that server made 85 million. Here comes the appeal.
Posted: Aug 16th 2010 5:39PM cic said
Consequences... WILL NEVER BE THE SAME!
Posted: Aug 16th 2010 7:48PM Patrick Mackey said
Private servers have existed and survived since the UO days. Tons of them sell microtransaction services or paypal donations. I doubt this will stop the private server community, but it will probably stymie the WoW pserver community, at least.
Posted: Aug 17th 2010 3:31AM blueimpact said
I will miss the Scapes servers. Couldn't care less if it's legal or not, honestly. The Vanilla-only server was awesome. There are many new gamers out there that pretend to be "oldschool" and never experienced the original World of Warcraft. They speak poorly about it only because it is a trend.
I speak poorly of it, because I know how horrible Wrath is compared to what once was. While I understand it's illegal and inevitable, I'm still sorry to see it go.
I speak poorly of it, because I know how horrible Wrath is compared to what once was. While I understand it's illegal and inevitable, I'm still sorry to see it go.
Posted: Aug 17th 2010 8:45AM Snichy said
People seem to miss the point on this thread. This (and virtually every comment by Tempes Magus irrespective of the article subject) is about how subscription games are evil and everythring should be free to play, and if you disagree you are wrong.
Posted: Aug 17th 2010 3:19PM Eldan said
Kinda a shame. I had fun there a long time ago. Anyone else here remember the Evolution guild on scape? Fond memories there.







