The most popular posts
in the last 7 days
- WoW loses another 100,000 subscribers 120 comments
- The Daily Grind: What's the highest sub fee you'd pay? 85 comments
- The Daily Grind: Are you currently on hiatus from MMOs? 69 comments
- Earthrise shutting down today 65 comments
- Star Trek Online unpacks Cardassian mystery boxes 57 comments
Massively Speaking Podcast
Massively Speaking Episode 185: Bree-to-play
Latest episode: Tuesday, February 7th, 2012



Reader Comments (1)
Posted: Jul 10th 2010 10:39AM (Unverified) said
Blizzard seemed eager and all set to expose their customers names to the world, they admitted having worked on this for a long time and I simply cannot believe that someone at Blizzard did not realise the implications on privacy, the only conclussion I can draw as that they were prepared to put potential increased profits ahead of their own customers privacy and that just does not sit well with me, neither does the corporate mission statement of 'Every voice counts' when they are going around telling people in the forums 'Don't like it, well don't post!'.
If a few good things have come out of this, it is that I'm sure many other companies will have been watching with fascination and I'm sure they will have taken onboard the outcome. Where Blizzard will be able to recover due to their sheer size, for other companies it could have literally spelt the end for them, I'm sure that is not lost on them and means they are hopefully much less likely to try something similar themselves. Even the mighty Blizzard will themselves now be more likely to approach this issue in a more sensative way.
Finally, it has taught me that I had allowed myself to become too comforted by the illusion of internet anonymity. I had allowed myself to be drawn into online discussions about quite sensitive issues, and that even though I'm not a troll, it has taught me that it is propably better to not take part in these discussions, or to allow game avatars to be able to be identified as belonging to real world minorities.