Curious as to whether or not your computer will be able to handle Final Fantasy XIV? We're due for an exclusive interview with Square-Enix in the very near future at E3, but that's focusing on game mechanics and story details. Luckily, much like Final Fantasy XI before, Square has made an official benchmark program available for prospective players. But it's more involved than its predecessor, allowing you to select from any of the game's races as well as supporting a test for high-definition displays.
The download itself is being hosted on NVIDIA's site, at a fairly reasonable 172 megabyte download. Once you have the program downloaded (and DirectX 9.0c installed, but that's more or less a given in this day and age), it runs without any complications and produces a numerical score after it runs through tests. Anything above a score of 1500 will be able to run the game just fine, but a look at the official rundown is well worth the time -- to see how much upgrading you'll have to do before Final Fantasy XIV's launch if nothing else.
Reader Comments (74)
Posted: Jun 15th 2010 9:06PM Tizmah said
I can tell you one thing, this game is going to have the best cutscenes seen in any MMO.
Posted: Jun 15th 2010 9:05PM (Unverified) said
cool, if nothing else i can get a look at the game
Posted: Jun 15th 2010 9:16PM (Unverified) said
Just ran it (2571) I gotta say the game looks better than I thought. Really awesome scenes...lets hope the gameplay matches up
Posted: Jun 15th 2010 9:30PM Saker said
Wish I could get it to run, it just inst-crashes immediately for me, Win 7's box comes up about looking for a solution...
Posted: Jun 18th 2010 3:08PM (Unverified) said
Same here. Running win7-64, Intel dual core i7 Q820, 8GB, radeon mobility 5870. Crashes right after video window comes up.
Reply
Posted: Jun 15th 2010 9:30PM Egobrane said
Ran the benchmark, got a 2956 score with 12562 load on a 9800GT with 3.1GHz core 2 duo and 2GB of RAM in windows XP 32 bit.
http://i47.tinypic.com/kb40ie.jpg
Another thing you should probably make a post about Eliot is SE's new video on youtube about the improved battle system:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eONoACmL5AM
I'm surprised this hasn't been posted here yet.
http://i47.tinypic.com/kb40ie.jpg
Another thing you should probably make a post about Eliot is SE's new video on youtube about the improved battle system:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eONoACmL5AM
I'm surprised this hasn't been posted here yet.
Posted: Jun 15th 2010 9:41PM Wisdomandlore said
Thanks for the link. Looks like it's all skills and no AA, like CoX or Champions. However, it still seems a little slow and cumbersome. Hard to tell if whomever's playing it was being slow to demonstrate, was unfamiliar with it, or if it's just the battle system.
Reply
Posted: Jun 15th 2010 9:33PM Wisdomandlore said
Ouch. >_< I'm in one of the lower brackets. The game looks fantastic. Here's hoping the gameplay keeps up.
Posted: Jun 15th 2010 9:42PM Wisdomandlore said
There's another new trailer (AFAIK) out as well. Looks fantastic.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h-JIdpHuLKY&feature=channel
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h-JIdpHuLKY&feature=channel
Posted: Jun 15th 2010 9:41PM AlluvianEstEndrati said
Yikes, scored under 1500. 8 gig good memory, quad core 2.5ghz AMD, Nvidia 9800GX2, Vista 64bit.
Posted: Jun 15th 2010 9:47PM (Unverified) said
Whew.... i came in with a score of 5818. Thats with a ATI 5870. So im happy to see that i have no worries. :D
Posted: Jun 15th 2010 10:05PM Blancmanche said
Win7 64bit, Core i7 920 3.1Ghz, 6GB RAM, 2x NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285
Hi res: score 2882, load time 10631
Low res: score 4798, load time 10349
The vid cards are probably what's holding it back, but it still looks awesome. Now I wonder if they'll have English voices in the retail release.
Hi res: score 2882, load time 10631
Low res: score 4798, load time 10349
The vid cards are probably what's holding it back, but it still looks awesome. Now I wonder if they'll have English voices in the retail release.
Posted: Jun 15th 2010 10:27PM (Unverified) said
Wow i got under 1500, i got exactly 1484...
8800 GT, Quad-Core Q6600 with 4 gigs of RAM. Win 7 64 bit...
I ran it in high rez though..
Are the "score standards on the site for high or low rez??? Cuz According to the test I cant play FF14 yet i know i can run some other pretty intense games fairly easily on my computer.....weird.
8800 GT, Quad-Core Q6600 with 4 gigs of RAM. Win 7 64 bit...
I ran it in high rez though..
Are the "score standards on the site for high or low rez??? Cuz According to the test I cant play FF14 yet i know i can run some other pretty intense games fairly easily on my computer.....weird.
Posted: Jul 17th 2010 12:15PM (Unverified) said
The score is for low settings so if you switch to low your score should double
Reply
Posted: Jun 15th 2010 11:04PM (Unverified) said
I should probably start freaking out...
Ran the benchmark low-res, got 561!! /sigh
2.5GHz Quad-Core, 6gig of ram, nvidia 9500GT w/ 1gig of ram, Win7 64bit.
Ran the benchmark low-res, got 561!! /sigh
2.5GHz Quad-Core, 6gig of ram, nvidia 9500GT w/ 1gig of ram, Win7 64bit.
Posted: Jun 16th 2010 1:03AM (Unverified) said
Upgrade that video card, mate. The 9500 won't run much of anything these days - at least get a 9800GT.
Reply
Posted: Jun 15th 2010 11:17PM (Unverified) said
Came up with a score of 996 on low resolution.
Still looks amazing, but they say I won't be able to play the game.
Still looks amazing, but they say I won't be able to play the game.
Posted: Jun 15th 2010 11:23PM mav1234 said
I don't know, the benchmark claims I'd be too low to play, yet my system exceeds the system requirements by far...
I am wondering if there is another competent to this.
I am wondering if there is another competent to this.
Posted: Jun 15th 2010 11:35PM (Unverified) said
I think the nice thing is, coming from someone with a 4k PC, is that the PS3 version is available to make it accessible.








