| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Joystiq, and more

Reader Comments (25)

Posted: Jun 14th 2010 8:51AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
@Troy, I agree that business and edu customers like me don't contribute as much to the short-term bottom line. But these sorts of users have deep institutional pockets, make multi-year commitments to amortize investments in equipment and software, and don't switch easily.

LL makes a huge mistake in alienating this market. Every edu project I know of has folks looking at Plan B, usually in the form of building copies of simulations for learning in Open Sim. Eventually, these grids will allow hypergridding and some sort of inventory transfer.

Then you'll see education investments depart SL gradually, just as Princeton did.

Posted: Jun 20th 2010 10:18PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
There is also the bot angle and its affect on the daily concurrency numbers, which can affect the LindeX:

http://thebotzone.net/2010/06/18/the-lindex-exchange-and-bot-manipulation/

And this week is SL7B! Almost a sort of pink slip party in a way...

Little Lost Linden
http://www.thebotzone.net

Posted: Jun 22nd 2010 9:24AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Thanks for the informative article! I have a quick question I'm hoping someone with better knowledge of the Linden Dollar can explain.

If The Lab never pays users USD for L$ as Tateru has said, I'm wondering how the Min and Max rates continued to be the same for so many consecutive days running prior to this recent fluctuation. i.e. Looking at the graph for the last 90 days, at http://secondlife.com/statistics/economy-market.php you can see Min/Max rates (shown in red) change only once in the last 90 days before the recent fluctuation. Surely someone would have to buy L$ to have kept the Min/Max rates so stable?

Posted: Jun 22nd 2010 10:47AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
One direction is controlled by creation of new Linden Dollars, and the other is a result of the growth of the economy itself. So long as the economy sufficiently closely matched the growth in the currency pool there's no need to buy up or destroy quantities of L$ to stabilize the system.

If the size of the L$ pool grows too quickly (or too slowly!) compared to the size of the economy then you start to lose stability. You see this in regular economies where a treasury over or under estimates economic growth and over/undershoots corrections to the currency pool.
Reply

Posted: Aug 18th 2010 8:34AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
As a side note, remember that Linden Lab is not dependent on merely the LindeX to be a very profitable company (i.e. their main service is really tier). The LindeX profits, when they exist, are merely the cherry on the top. Still, losing 1.5 million USD per quarter — no matter how big the impact on the overall profitablity! — is more than enough to send a clear sign to the Board that something is not working well!!

Featured Stories

Coming soon
Engadget

Engadget

Joystiq

Joystiq

WoW Insider

WoW

TUAW

TUAW