The most popular posts
in the last 7 days
- WoW loses another 100,000 subscribers 156 comments
- The Daily Grind: What dead game would you play in a second if it revived? 129 comments
- The Daily Grind: What's the highest sub fee you'd pay? 86 comments
- BioWare kicks off Star Wars: The Old Republic Q&A Fridays 78 comments
- Earthrise shutting down today 69 comments
Massively Speaking Podcast
Massively Speaking Episode 185: Bree-to-play
Latest episode: Tuesday, February 7th, 2012
Reader Comments (3)
Posted: Mar 11th 2010 5:03PM EdmundDante said
But given it's only the Star Trek IP and almost nobody really knows much about Star Trek, I guess it didn't really matter - rushing the MMO out the door. After all - what's quality have anything to do with making a profit when you got plenty of suckers out there to exploit?
Posted: Mar 11th 2010 5:45PM (Unverified) said
Quit bitching about the launch state already and use this information to decide whether or not you want to play this now or in the future.
Going back and bashing the developer over real or perceived past sins does nothing for anyone, nor does it make you (or them) "teh winnorz".
Posted: Mar 12th 2010 12:03AM Eamil said
You know, I'd understand if you were pissed at the lack of Klingon PvE content. But just crying about how there are "only two factions" at launch? WTF?