The specific actions I cited of Linden Lab taking down content all involved trademarks. Linden Lab does not actually have any special method of reporting trademark infringements (other than their published procedure of filing an abuse report - which could well be outdated considering the amount of confusion I had in getting the Lab to deal with an infringing trademark in SL just a couple of months ago, in my capacity as a rights-holder). Thus, no 'disinformation'.

As for Marty? Past attempts to contact him have been unsuccessful. Attempts to clarify trademark handling procedures have been responded to by misinformed Lab staff who aren't clear on the difference between a copyright and a trademark. But I'm not a journalist, so I'm probably pretty low on the PR totem-pole.