| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Joystiq, and more

Reader Comments (7)

Posted: Jan 11th 2010 1:05PM Darkdust said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I don't quite get the reasoning here. Storage is cheap and it surely can't be that they want to free up storage space. This will likely dissuade players from wanting to get involved with a Funcom game, as they might start to level a character then decide to wait until a game has matured a little more (or fixed something they didn't like, or whatever).

Potential cost with no benefit I can perceive. Bad move.
Reply

Posted: Jan 11th 2010 2:16PM ultimateq said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
It's not about the storage space, it's about scaring people into reactivating their accounts, so they can get money. At least that is how I view it. Correct me if I'm wrong anybody.
Reply

Posted: Jan 11th 2010 2:35PM Derf said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Enterprise level storage is not cheap. It's cheaper now then it has been in the past, but it's still pricey. The other aspect is whenever you add storage you have to add costs for staff to maintain that storage, additional costs are incurred for licensing of the SAN storage, backup costs, and electricity/cooling.
Reply

Posted: Jan 11th 2010 2:48PM Darkdust said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
David, it's a lot cheaper than it was (and I speak as somebody who has specified, implemented, and audited enterprise SANs). If they're running up against storage constraints at this point, and can't get budgetary increases, they likely have topline revenue problems (to UltimateQ's point).

Still, disincentives will not motivate customers as well as incentives will.

With whom would you rather do business? The company that threatens you if you don't reactivate, or the company that offers a little bonus to come back together with a couple of days of 'free' play?
Reply

Posted: Jan 11th 2010 5:30PM Res said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'd think you'd need a larger number of subs before "space in the database" became an issue. They are just doing this to encourage people to think about those toons they played for 2 weeks last year and sign up again in order to keep them alive.
Reply

Posted: Jan 12th 2010 8:12PM MewmewGrrl said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Absolutely, of course it's to threaten people "come pay or we'll wipe your characters." We have some sense of life in our old characters sometimes, even if we aren't ever going to play them again. Then there is an issue people have with names, and thinking of others using them. It truly is a scare tactic. And I'm a current paying customer. I always come back once and a while to re-play old games I have characters on. At least if I stop playing and they wipe me, I will have an excuse to never go back. People who actually believe it's a space issue are seriously naive.
Reply

Posted: Jan 17th 2010 1:03PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
*** Enterprise level storage is not cheap ***

Enterprise-level storage is DIRT cheap by the standards of enterprises. For all practical purposes, free.

Impact on database performance is something else, though. Actively-played characters in an MMO can comprise as little as 5% of existing characters. Purging unused accounts can be a big win from that perspective.

Reply

Massively Speaking Podcast

Massively Speaking Episode 185: Bree-to-play

Latest episode: Tuesday, February 7th, 2012

Engadget

Joystiq

WoW

TUAW