| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Joystiq, and more

Reader Comments (15)

Posted: Jan 5th 2010 9:07AM Wisdomandlore said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"Moving between the sunlit fields and the dim dungeons is seamless with no area change. "

I hope that means no zoned areas, and more of a free, connected world. Maybe this will even be the first game with area-transitions that make sense?

Posted: Jan 5th 2010 9:32AM RogueJedi86 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
What do you mean by your question?
Reply

Posted: Jan 5th 2010 9:46AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
He means he hopes this game's zones are more like WoW in that there are no loading screens between them instead of say Age of Conan where each zone is a separate instance. I have to say I hope that is the case as well.
Reply

Posted: Jan 5th 2010 10:09AM ultimateq said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Having zones doesn't bother me. A seamless world, to me, is over-rated. I can see why some people like it, we each have different tastes.

For me, I'd rather have very intuitive and fun combat, rather than a seamless world.
Reply

Posted: Jan 5th 2010 10:28AM Cendres said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Yes the world is said to be very seamless, they are instances and the zones are very large, but mostly you'll be able to walk into a town and not have to see a loading screen for example, some dungeons or caves are also seamless, you just walk in them. :)
Reply

Posted: Jan 6th 2010 11:08PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
'be the first game with area-transitions that make sense'

Meaning that the areas don't suddenly and randomly change, it is more of a natural progression like the real world from one area to the next. (for those who didn't understand)
Reply

Posted: Jan 5th 2010 10:08AM MrGutts said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I just hope they release this game way before the blitz of all the fall games and xpaks to games. I hate it when companies lump all this crap into the same month/quarter as others and then they force you to choose.

Posted: Jan 5th 2010 11:14AM Barinthos said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
If they try and release this at the same time as, say, Cataclysm (all WoW jokes and bashing aside) they'll be shooting themselves in the foot something bad. Same with a release matching SWTOR, Secret World and even APB.

I mentioned those games since they don't really have a release date planned, the same with FFXIV.
Reply

Posted: Jan 5th 2010 10:52AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Should I be interested in this game if I've never played any Final Fantasy game including FFXI?

Posted: Jan 5th 2010 11:40AM koehler83 said

  • 1 heart
  • Report
No.
Reply

Posted: Jan 5th 2010 11:55AM Barinthos said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
You don't have to associate this with the Final Fantasy universe really. Just like any other new MMO doesn't have an army of lore preceding it you can go into it with an open mind and give it a shot.
Reply

Posted: Jan 5th 2010 12:50PM RogueJedi86 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
XIV is a spiritual successor to XI, not a direct sequel. You don't have to have played XI first, it just makes it easier to recognize similarities between the 2 if you're familiar with XI.
Reply

Posted: Jan 5th 2010 11:18AM Arkanaloth said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
2010 at last, I was ready for 2009 to be over the instant FF14 was announced at E3. All signed up for the beta too... now I'm just waiting for a release date so I can pre-order a copy.

Posted: Jan 5th 2010 11:54AM Barinthos said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Same. I keep thinking "Less info! More beta start!"
Reply

Posted: Jan 7th 2010 4:51AM ChongShin said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Can someone post a mirror, please The ffxivcore.com site is dead, at least for now.

Featured Stories

Coming soon
Engadget

Engadget

Joystiq

Joystiq

WoW Insider

WoW

TUAW

TUAW