If you thought you could hide online, think again. Alfred "Rastlynn" Hightower just found out that when you're playing World of Warcraft, you can't hide from the law.
Hightower was wanted in Howard County, Indiana for two charges of dealing a controlled substance and for dealing marijuana, but had fled the country to Canada. Howard County sheriffs had enlisted the help of the U.S. Marshals to track down the suspect, and were working with the Royal Canadian Mounted Police to extradite him. However, they had to locate him first.Through investigation, Sheriff's Deparment Deputy Matt Robertson and Sheriff's Major Steve Rogers found that Hightower was fond of an online game that sounded very much like World of Warcraft. Robertson prepared and sent a subpoena to Blizzard Entertainment, not expecting a response as Blizzard is in California where Howard County has no jurisdiction -- the subpoena was nothing more than a kindly worded request in the eyes of the law.
Blizzard, three months later, sent over a package of information that included Hightower's IP address, surprising and stunning the Sheriff's Department. This new information allowed Robertson and Rogers to trace and pinpoint Hightower's location in Canada.
Hightower is currently being extradited to the US to face criminal charges. For the full story, check out the Kokomo Perspective.
[Thanks for the tip, Tim!]
Reader Comments (59)
Posted: Jan 1st 2010 3:40PM (Unverified) said
Your grasp on philosophy and ethics is questionable at best.
Reply
Posted: Dec 31st 2009 4:39PM dudes said
Not even Horde shammy's can escape the law.
Posted: Dec 31st 2009 5:45PM (Unverified) said
Owned.
Hopefully this doesnt create a movement for government online intrusion into virtual communities. (Consistently I mean)
Hopefully this doesnt create a movement for government online intrusion into virtual communities. (Consistently I mean)
Posted: Dec 31st 2009 6:03PM (Unverified) said
It all may have been nice and legal, but I find it disturbing on Blizzard's part. That said, just like any corporation, they have very little to lose and everything to gain by cooperating with whatever authorities knock on their door.
Many here are holding up "the law is the law, and should be obeyed" as some sort of ideal, but law is nothing more than some peoples' opinion written down on a piece of paper, that some people think is gospel because those people are "legislators". There's no indication that this guy was wanted for harming another person, violating their property, or violating their rights. In my mind, that makes whatever "law" he broke just a load of crap. He sold a substance that someone wanted, at a price they were willing to pay, no matter what some knuckleheads calling themselves the "Indiana State Legislature" have to say about it.
And for those who say "if you don't like the law, you should change it!", I have this to say: Try it sometime. Tell me how well that works for you.
Many here are holding up "the law is the law, and should be obeyed" as some sort of ideal, but law is nothing more than some peoples' opinion written down on a piece of paper, that some people think is gospel because those people are "legislators". There's no indication that this guy was wanted for harming another person, violating their property, or violating their rights. In my mind, that makes whatever "law" he broke just a load of crap. He sold a substance that someone wanted, at a price they were willing to pay, no matter what some knuckleheads calling themselves the "Indiana State Legislature" have to say about it.
And for those who say "if you don't like the law, you should change it!", I have this to say: Try it sometime. Tell me how well that works for you.
Posted: Jan 1st 2010 3:26PM (Unverified) said
But your "rights" are just an opinion written down on a piece of paper by people who label themselves "legislators." Funny how that works.
Your rights are laws that keep legislators from writing other laws, and are amendable through the system, the same as laws. All that enforces either are the selfsame "law enforcement officers," whose entire job it is to (gasp) enforce the law! If you don't want to be on the receiving end of the execution of their duties, don't break the law in the first place.
As for changing the law, it happens all the time, through either legislation or court orders, through the efforts of ordinary people. And it DOES work. Otherwise, the "colored peoples" would still be sitting in the back of the bus.
Reply
Your rights are laws that keep legislators from writing other laws, and are amendable through the system, the same as laws. All that enforces either are the selfsame "law enforcement officers," whose entire job it is to (gasp) enforce the law! If you don't want to be on the receiving end of the execution of their duties, don't break the law in the first place.
As for changing the law, it happens all the time, through either legislation or court orders, through the efforts of ordinary people. And it DOES work. Otherwise, the "colored peoples" would still be sitting in the back of the bus.
Posted: Dec 31st 2009 6:04PM (Unverified) said
@djellerman
Dude, seriously?
Back on topic:
I think the guys at Blizzard probably took as long as they did because of the large influx of mail they probably get, also with the internal horsecrap of "who can authorize this, who does this go to" crap, and finally got back to them. They probably did a small bit of research there as well, in that time.
I think its great. Any company that will extend a "professional courtesy" like they did and help these guys out, is pretty awesome in my book. I have just a small little tiny scrap of respect for Blizzard atm.
Also, if you REALLY think Blizzard just blindly sent the info back to the "return address on the letterhead" without following any due dilligence and verifying this, You are absolutely an idiot. Shoot yourself.
Blizzard, I'm sure has a whole freaking platoon of lawyers on the payroll, and not a single one of them would have let this happen without some verification. Seriously, Get over it.
Dude, seriously?
Back on topic:
I think the guys at Blizzard probably took as long as they did because of the large influx of mail they probably get, also with the internal horsecrap of "who can authorize this, who does this go to" crap, and finally got back to them. They probably did a small bit of research there as well, in that time.
I think its great. Any company that will extend a "professional courtesy" like they did and help these guys out, is pretty awesome in my book. I have just a small little tiny scrap of respect for Blizzard atm.
Also, if you REALLY think Blizzard just blindly sent the info back to the "return address on the letterhead" without following any due dilligence and verifying this, You are absolutely an idiot. Shoot yourself.
Blizzard, I'm sure has a whole freaking platoon of lawyers on the payroll, and not a single one of them would have let this happen without some verification. Seriously, Get over it.
Posted: Dec 31st 2009 6:37PM (Unverified) said
I don't think it's such a great thing. I mean, sure, this particular individual probably got what he deserved but there have been several instances in the past when similar methods have been used against otherwise-law abiding citizens who were activists or protesters of some sort. Sure, the search list google hands over might not have anything outright illegal on it, but perhaps you have a fetish or are having an affair that would be embarrassing to you either personally or professionally.
Suppose all they had to go on was a friend of his, maybe his girlfriend's account, and Blizzard somehow inadvertently damaged her reputation, or that of anyone else's, by handing information over in an attempt to find this guy. Would common courtesy be so valued by so many of you then?
I'm not saying it shouldn't be, or that catching a fugitive is a bad thing, just that the precedent it sets should scare people a little more than it does. Certainly, if you are pro-patriot act, stop looking at that furry porn, you sick fuck :)
Suppose all they had to go on was a friend of his, maybe his girlfriend's account, and Blizzard somehow inadvertently damaged her reputation, or that of anyone else's, by handing information over in an attempt to find this guy. Would common courtesy be so valued by so many of you then?
I'm not saying it shouldn't be, or that catching a fugitive is a bad thing, just that the precedent it sets should scare people a little more than it does. Certainly, if you are pro-patriot act, stop looking at that furry porn, you sick fuck :)
Posted: Jan 1st 2010 3:36PM (Unverified) said
The Patriot Act is a perfect example of a "bad law." That said, abuse by the law should be addressed WHEN it happens, not BEFORE it happens. That guy you just met might try to kill you, but you should fight back WHEN it happens, not BEFORE it happens. Otherwise, you could be assaulting an innocent man.
Reply
Posted: Jan 2nd 2010 11:00AM (Unverified) said
Technology is changing law enforcement. Technology is a two-way street. Just as county government can use legal process to access electronic records against an adversary like Hightower, the county's legal adversaries can demand from the county extensive records about activities like police investigations. Experience shows that if the county does a poor job retaining its records, the county can suffer in court. See for example http://legal-beagle.typepad.com/wrights_legal_beagle/2009/11/records-policy.html
Posted: Jan 2nd 2010 11:53AM (Unverified) said
One of my favorite things about Blizzard was when browsing through the "Thanks to" area of the back of the Starcraft manual when they thanked "420". I understand the position they were in and what they were legally obliged to do, but that's really weak. tsk tsk Blizzard.
Posted: Jan 2nd 2010 4:23PM Lionhearted said
That's the thing: they weren't "legally obliged" to do it. There was no official warrant by the court demanding Blizzard send over the information. There was a polite letter by the police from a different state asking if Blizzard could, perchance, send the information over. And Blizzard did so, without being legally required to do it.
This is a clear loophole right around the fourth amendment. Companies shouldn't hand to the government their costumer's information, *unless* the police go through the same stringent process they would to force *you* to hand over your information... a warrant issued by a court of law.
Reply
This is a clear loophole right around the fourth amendment. Companies shouldn't hand to the government their costumer's information, *unless* the police go through the same stringent process they would to force *you* to hand over your information... a warrant issued by a court of law.
Posted: Jan 2nd 2010 12:20PM (Unverified) said
OMG! Typical, pot heads crying foul over their inability to respect the Law of the land. Listen, you gave up your right to privacy in this game the minute you agreed to the ToS. Please do /quitWoW4life as people like you do not really contribute anything to 'it' and or life in general. Its not about the laughably innocent pot dealers or users. Its about where the revenue from said sales goes. Lets see pot has been and is traded for firearms, currency, explosives, kevlar , and a myriad of other items that I assure you have not stopped in the american 'dealers' house. And really who said this guy was a pot dealer only? Frankly there is no such thing. People screaming 'Big Brother' and such are in fact between the ages of 13-18, and or failures who at over 20 are still living with mommy and daddy cause they spend their money on bud and 24/7 playing WoW.
Seriously mr 'there is nothing wrong with bud'... the next time you bong. Remember this you might have bought that gun for someone that killed your neighbour. You might have paid for a little more TnT and or C4 for a IeD somewhere. You might be buying some TP for that camp training people somewhere to hack your head off in your sleep or worse yet the head of a innocent person somewhere who's only crime is the desire to be free. The 'innocent' 'victimless' rug my butt there is no such thing. Kudo's to Blizz! Get more of these self serving pot heads out of your game pls and thanks.
Seriously mr 'there is nothing wrong with bud'... the next time you bong. Remember this you might have bought that gun for someone that killed your neighbour. You might have paid for a little more TnT and or C4 for a IeD somewhere. You might be buying some TP for that camp training people somewhere to hack your head off in your sleep or worse yet the head of a innocent person somewhere who's only crime is the desire to be free. The 'innocent' 'victimless' rug my butt there is no such thing. Kudo's to Blizz! Get more of these self serving pot heads out of your game pls and thanks.
Posted: Jan 2nd 2010 4:29PM Lionhearted said
Wow, typical fascist BS from the people who cheer the demise of democracy...
I've never smoked pot in my life, not a single time, and I still see clearly that this is wrong. This is a clear work-around of the mother f*ing fourth amendment, perhaps the most important right you have in the bill of rights. If you can't see how this is ripe for abuse, maybe you should broaden your horizon?
Reply
I've never smoked pot in my life, not a single time, and I still see clearly that this is wrong. This is a clear work-around of the mother f*ing fourth amendment, perhaps the most important right you have in the bill of rights. If you can't see how this is ripe for abuse, maybe you should broaden your horizon?
Posted: Jan 5th 2010 2:00PM (Unverified) said
This person has not been convicted of ANY crimes.
He has a Warrant for his arrest based on Charges filed against him. He has not been Proven guilty, and thus this is not the case of tracking down a convicted criminal.
I'm quite sure this guy is guilty, but that really doesn't matter, because this isn't about "this guy", it's about the courts ability to order companies to provide this information for people when the person has not been convicted of any crime. It's not evidence of wrongdoing they requested, as that is a completely different story.
Reply
He has a Warrant for his arrest based on Charges filed against him. He has not been Proven guilty, and thus this is not the case of tracking down a convicted criminal.
I'm quite sure this guy is guilty, but that really doesn't matter, because this isn't about "this guy", it's about the courts ability to order companies to provide this information for people when the person has not been convicted of any crime. It's not evidence of wrongdoing they requested, as that is a completely different story.
Posted: Jan 5th 2010 1:51PM (Unverified) said
Blizzards easy co-operation with this subpoena is a very bad sign for online privacy. They were not helping capture a convicted felon, in which case I would be a little more understanding. ISP's have been fighting subpoena's for this type of information for years, and it troubles me that Blizzard didn't even try to put up a fight.
With this type of acquiescence it won't be long before there are services popping up helping people create completely Anonymous Online Entities to ensure their privacy cannot be breached by a quickly thrown together Subpoena for a Warrant issued in error.
With this type of acquiescence it won't be long before there are services popping up helping people create completely Anonymous Online Entities to ensure their privacy cannot be breached by a quickly thrown together Subpoena for a Warrant issued in error.
Posted: Jan 6th 2010 12:51PM (Unverified) said
Ok add the stupidity of the drug war to the long list of things massively.com posters are ignorant ranting jackasses about.
Posted: Jan 6th 2010 1:22PM Seraphina Brennan said
Yes, because there's obviously a seekret opinionated agenda going on here. Not the fact that we're posting news related to MMOs.
Reply
Posted: Jan 7th 2010 11:34AM Seraphina Brennan said
Ohhhh... Yes. They can swing many, many ways, can't they? Certainly many opinions around here.
Anywho, carry on then! *salutes*
Reply
Anywho, carry on then! *salutes*







