| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Joystiq, and more

Reader Comments (9)

Posted: Dec 14th 2009 9:21AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
SWG NGE - I was the first to mention it... ROFL

Posted: Dec 14th 2009 9:40AM Scopique said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I agree. I'd love to see an AO sequel rather then an update, but FunCom's put a lot of work into AO, and are busy with TSW and in trying to get AoC on track. Would they take on a FOURTH MMO, when AO had one of the worst launches in history, AoC has questionable footing, and some people wonder if FunCom can actually pull off a stable, interesting TSW?

If TSW doesn't knock it out of the park, I think we'll be thankfull that AO even got as much as a graphical upgrade, because we could kiss any chance of a sequel goodbye.

Posted: Dec 14th 2009 9:45AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The Secret World is basically the kind of game (notice that I say game and not MMO here) that I absolutely want to see succeed. It's got so much more depth to it than many other titles out there, that I just really want it to meet our collective expectations.

As for AO, I'm happy with a visual update. I do hope they make sure it still "feels" like the same game, aesthetically speaking.
Reply

Posted: Dec 14th 2009 10:27AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
AO is death one of it's three servers is going to be shoutdown and the new engine if its ever hits live won't change anything

Posted: Dec 14th 2009 11:31AM CCon99 said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I wish LotRO would "revitalize" their character models. Their game offers some of the best landscapes and scenery offered in any game, but you have to run around on those gorgeous landscapes with terrible looking models.

Posted: Dec 14th 2009 3:13PM Cinnamoon said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'm not sure I'd agree with author re graphical overhauls not happening often. On the contrary, most of the older MMOs have gotten at least one, some more. Likewise, it's hard to argue that "prettier visuals" will draw in the crowds -- UO's multiple visual overhauls are prime examples of that simply not being so (the vast majority of players prefer the ugly graphics from 1997). In fact, what seems to draw in the crowds are the games that pander to longtime veterans and loyal playerbases with consistently good (or at least consistent) gameplay, content, events, and, above all, nostalgia. New games by definition and design lack years worth of meat. Of course they fail to rope in folks accustomed to their comfortable sandboxes.

The sad part about SWG's NGE is that it chased off a lot of folks who will never give it a chance again. The same is true of articles like this one, which insinuate that the game imploded and even stopped dead over four years ago. I despised NGE, but SWG has come a very long way since then. The dev teams since then have been pretty focused on repairing the NGE's damage, reinstating pre-NGE systems, and improving on existing ones. I wish more authors would remember that while SWG is a convenient object lesson in "not changing too much", it's also a good lesson in "recovering from stupidity." But I suspect the former is better readerbait. Who doesn't love to kick the NGE around?

Posted: Dec 14th 2009 4:41PM Lateris said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Agreed but I do want to see a complete Avatar update for AO just as a fan of good art.
Reply

Posted: Dec 14th 2009 4:42PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
You might be a little insecure about something. The title page doesn't mention SWG, the banner graphic is AO, and your epidermis is showing.


If it was NGE readerbait, there'd have been a mention of that in the top paragraph. It's not an article about recovery from stupidity, it's about the pitfalls of keeping an MMO going for a long time.
Reply

Posted: Dec 15th 2009 8:51PM Evy said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I would -adore- a reason to go back to AO. I really really would.

Featured Stories

Coming soon
Engadget

Engadget

Joystiq

Joystiq

WoW Insider

WoW

TUAW

TUAW