The most popular posts
in the last 7 days
- WoW loses another 100,000 subscribers 156 comments
- The Daily Grind: What dead game would you play in a second if it revived? 129 comments
- The Daily Grind: What's the highest sub fee you'd pay? 86 comments
- BioWare kicks off Star Wars: The Old Republic Q&A Fridays 78 comments
- Earthrise shutting down today 69 comments
Massively Speaking Podcast
Massively Speaking Episode 185: Bree-to-play
Latest episode: Tuesday, February 7th, 2012



Reader Comments (4)
Posted: Dec 8th 2009 12:41PM (Unverified) said
I'm not trying to be sarcastic or rude, but just take a second and consider that some of the people who have complained about CO just might have some valid points to their negative perception of the game.
It's not personal. It's nothing against people who find things they do enjoy about CO. It is just feedback from people who did shell out money for a game that was, honestly, incredibly sparse and buggy at launch. It might be better now, but constant server outages and lack of content cost CO big time.
Posted: Dec 8th 2009 1:30PM DrDvorak said
Note - I'm *not* saying your post is an example of this type of behavior. It's just something I've observed in other CO-related discussions online. See the comments on yesterday's champions-related post for an example.
For those of us that like the game, shortcomings and all, it just gets really tiresome. I'm willing to bet that's the motivation behind electrobix's post.
Posted: Dec 8th 2009 1:45PM (Unverified) said
I absolutely agree with you. My point is aimed at all the neep-noppers whining about issues in the game that have been dealt with. To those I say:"let it go!"
Yes, there was a launch nerf. It happened...deal!
I haven't experienced any servers going down in quite a while, and I play almost daily.
Although the channels have been quiet in the past, I'm starting to see more LFG requests and casual banter, which makes me believe a community is building.
I don't mind people bringing up valid pertinent issues, like more activities for supergroups, but most of the points that are brought up every time a CO article comes out sound like dead-horse beating.
Posted: Dec 8th 2009 1:51PM CCon99 said