The most popular posts
in the last 7 days
- WoW loses another 100,000 subscribers 150 comments
- The Daily Grind: What's the highest sub fee you'd pay? 85 comments
- Earthrise shutting down today 69 comments
- BioWare kicks off Star Wars: The Old Republic Q&A Fridays 67 comments
- Star Trek Online unpacks Cardassian mystery boxes 60 comments
Massively Speaking Podcast
Massively Speaking Episode 185: Bree-to-play
Latest episode: Tuesday, February 7th, 2012



Reader Comments (1)
Posted: Nov 9th 2009 6:30PM (Unverified) said
But I do agree that the game lacks what it needs to be competitive as a true mmo: the questing areas are dull and lifeless, and literally walk you down a set path complete with sequentially numbered quest hubs and markings on the map that point out where to go for each quest, effectively eliminating the need for any quest text at all. Also, there just isn't a story going on. I've been playing WAR off and on since beta and I can't name a single significant figure in the game's story. There's a solid setting, but essentially no characters or plot advancement within that setting.
However, I don't feel that WAR is a bad game, despite my immense frustration with the current all city siege, all the time state. What I do think is that Mythic failed from the start to understand exactly what type of game they were building. I honestly feel that they should've either built a properly fleshed-out immersive world, or created a sort of sandbox PvP game with a much more open world.
I'd say their best bet now is to adopt a free to play model (without micro transactions please! just think Guild Wars) and either streamline the entire "rpg" element of the game such as the leveling process and questing, or flesh out the rpg element entirely to make WAR a proper mmoRPG (the latter is unlikely to happen though considering the current state of the game and Mythic alike)