The most popular posts
in the last 7 days
- WoW loses another 100,000 subscribers 156 comments
- The Daily Grind: What dead game would you play in a second if it revived? 110 comments
- The Daily Grind: What's the highest sub fee you'd pay? 86 comments
- BioWare kicks off Star Wars: The Old Republic Q&A Fridays 78 comments
- Earthrise shutting down today 69 comments
Massively Speaking Podcast
Massively Speaking Episode 185: Bree-to-play
Latest episode: Tuesday, February 7th, 2012



Reader Comments (3)
Posted: Nov 5th 2009 8:29AM Lethality said
That still leaves room for billions of dollars in profit for this fluff for them.
Posted: Nov 5th 2009 8:33AM Holgranth said
Posted: Nov 5th 2009 9:47AM (Unverified) said
But I don't think they should go beyond pets or possibly mounts/tabards/vanity items. Adding items with actual PvE/PvP use (such as a new weapon for end game, although paid-for Heirlooms might be a good use of this system) to give an advantage is wrong, though. It's kinda what annoyed me about Free Realms. To get any decent health potions, you need to slap down some cash for membership, which I found kinda unfair.
I don't agree with the prices though, it's ridiculous. I'm still wishing I hadn't put down £20 for a faction change!