The most popular posts
in the last 7 days
- WoW loses another 100,000 subscribers 156 comments
- The Daily Grind: What dead game would you play in a second if it revived? 110 comments
- The Daily Grind: What's the highest sub fee you'd pay? 86 comments
- BioWare kicks off Star Wars: The Old Republic Q&A Fridays 78 comments
- Earthrise shutting down today 69 comments
Massively Speaking Podcast
Massively Speaking Episode 185: Bree-to-play
Latest episode: Tuesday, February 7th, 2012



Reader Comments (6)
Posted: Nov 5th 2009 8:04AM (Unverified) said
I think it's a bit too much for a non combat pet.
Posted: Nov 5th 2009 8:20AM (Unverified) said
And I agree, $10 is an insane price for a single microtransaction item. Just wait though, like giving a junky his first hit, tons of WoW fans will buy it because, "heck, it's only $10." Then Blizzard will know it's open season on MTs.
Posted: Nov 5th 2009 10:22AM Rihahn said
Posted: Nov 5th 2009 11:04AM (Unverified) said
Of the two pets up for sale, only one of them applies to the charity. Of that one, it's only 50% of the proceeds. Additionally, it's only for a limited time. If the true intent of this was to assist a charity then it would be both pets and a larger percentage (if not 100%) of the money.
However, I'm sure Blizzard will be happy to know that their marketing ploy is working.
Posted: Nov 5th 2009 11:35AM (Unverified) said
Anyhow I'm not playing WOW currently, so I've just made a $10 donation to Make-a-Wish instead of the stupid pet. This way I get to claim it on my taxes not Blizzards.
Posted: Nov 5th 2009 12:01PM Eamil said
Then I remembered that Champions pets were about $1 each, considerably cheaper, BUT you only get them on one character.
In that light, $10 for a pet you get on all your current and future characters forever seems like a pretty fair deal to me.