| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Joystiq, and more

Reader Comments (13)

Posted: Nov 3rd 2009 11:20AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I really love the "officer" promotion feature he is talking about. That might be the only reason I switch to this because I have not experienced any of the issues he has with vent.

"Hey, you know it'd be really great if inside the channel you could just allow the officers to talk among themselves by hitting a different keystroke." Yea vent does that, you just have to spend the 2.5 minutes to figure out a key bind...

All in all it seems like a very worthy project and I hope it turns out well
Reply

Posted: Nov 3rd 2009 11:22AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Oh your link to blabbelon just below the banner is broken ;)
Reply

Posted: Nov 3rd 2009 11:26AM jpkustra said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Sounds very cool! I might actually have to start using VOIP if it really is that easy.
Reply

Posted: Nov 3rd 2009 11:30AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Signed up, trying to get people I play with to sign up so we can try it out also.
Reply

Posted: Nov 3rd 2009 11:51AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"you can only talk amongst people that you're partied up with, so how do you deal with a guild that's not going to be partied up all the time just to talk to each other?"


Ummm....

I have been using the WoW in-game voice feature since it came out to talk with my friends that are not in my guild or in my party. After seeing how little he knows about that service, it makes me wonder how much other info he missed.
Reply

Posted: Nov 3rd 2009 12:06PM jpkustra said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I don't know anything about the WoW voice chat so this is just a question. Can you talk to guildies, those in your party and friends simultaneously? I think that's what he's saying you can't do.
Reply

Posted: Nov 3rd 2009 12:41PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I don't get how they plan to make support this if it's totally free. It doesn't compute.
Reply

Posted: Nov 3rd 2009 12:53PM jpkustra said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'm guessing there will be advertisement banners on the page since it's browser based. Which, if this is the case, doesn't bother me. It's no different than seeing Massively and it's advertisements.
Reply

Posted: Nov 3rd 2009 1:39PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Or investors and people who join into business contracts to use their services and technology. A lot of web stuff is free for the end user simply by getting money from the bigger fish out there.

I'm looking forward to trying this out. Right now my buddies and I use Skype for voice chat, because it's call-and-go, and the lag hasn't been bad. But if this is in all ways better, we might migrate.
Reply

Posted: Nov 3rd 2009 12:55PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I really don't want to be down on this service, but I'm getting a serious dot-bomb vibe from this interview. It has everything. The statement that the way it's done is obviously wrong. The engineer name drop. The partnership with Famous Company X. The technical description that's not very technical. The magic patent.

I especially have two pieces of advice. Don't say you're going to get technical and then uses phrases like "the amount of internet". Say "bandwidth". Also, don't talk about reducing bandwidth use, and then say you're going send multiple streams to the client. Server muxing reduces bandwidth. Client and server muxing each have their own advantages and disadvantages, but reduced bandwidth belongs to server muxing, not client. The "technical" statements, as given, are just going to make technical people laugh.

That said, I hope and expect them to do well. I don't know about unseating Vent or TeamSpeak, but there's some nice concepts here that people are going to love. The TS and Vent clients are a little weak, so more competition is a great thing. Better cross-platform support is a HUGE advantage. Landing a codec from Skype is a GINORMOUS advantage over speex. I'm going to chalk up the awkwardness of the interview to somebody not experienced at giving interviews.
Reply

Posted: Nov 3rd 2009 12:58PM Slob Zombie said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Just in case anyone developing VOIP clients is reading and cares what one guy thinks, this is what me and my small group of friends look for:

1. Does it support persistent rooms that users can connect to at will (as opposed to call-based like Skype)?
2. Does it support auto-detect communication (we don't like push-to-talk)?
3. Does it support broadcasting audio files (obviously you'd want to disable this for large groups, but there's only a handful of us and we love being able to broadcast music for each other)?
4. Does it support channels (or systems like this or Voon where you can create multiple rooms at will)?

Currently we're using Voon. The sound quality is great and it supports all of the above except #3 (afaik). From what I can tell, Blabbelon doesn't support #3 but more importantly #2, and that's a dealbreaker for us.

Good start though. Seems like Blab has a lot going for it, it's just not for us (yet).
Reply

Posted: Nov 3rd 2009 4:15PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Indeed, the PTT-only part is keeping me from getting it when I'm just playing online with a friend, and not as a team, for which we use Skype. Not having to have one finger poised on a control key is nice.
Reply

Posted: Nov 3rd 2009 6:29PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Sounds interesting and I'll try it out, but I can't see it replacing Mumble for us anytime soon.
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Storyboard: Over, done, finished, finito

Posted on Feb 10th 2012 9:00PM

Betawatch: February 4 - 10, 2012

Posted on Feb 10th 2012 8:00PM

The Firing Line: Controller wars edition

Posted on Feb 10th 2012 1:00PM

Engadget

Joystiq

WoW

TUAW