The most popular posts
in the last 7 days
- WoW loses another 100,000 subscribers 156 comments
- The Daily Grind: What dead game would you play in a second if it revived? 110 comments
- The Daily Grind: What's the highest sub fee you'd pay? 86 comments
- BioWare kicks off Star Wars: The Old Republic Q&A Fridays 78 comments
- Earthrise shutting down today 69 comments
Massively Speaking Podcast
Massively Speaking Episode 185: Bree-to-play
Latest episode: Tuesday, February 7th, 2012



Reader Comments (3)
Posted: Nov 2nd 2009 8:10PM (Unverified) said
Posted: Nov 3rd 2009 1:58AM (Unverified) said
I agree. I really tried to like Champions Online but it's just a disaster IMHO. I've totally given up on it.
Right now I'm taking a break from CoH while i gear up to play MW2 & L4D2 for a couple months. I'll be back in time for the Holiday Event they throw every year; skiing down the mountain hovering outside Pocket D.
I'm eagerly awaiting Going Rogue so i can have some new adventures.
Especially if they update the graphics a little (even though they're still better than CO's by a lightyear; CO's gfx make my eyes burn).
Posted: Nov 3rd 2009 3:52AM Psychotic Storm said
The article is about how unsafe are NCSoft games from NCSoft and partially explains the TR tragedy, NCSoft does not care about a games performance or even if it can sustain itself, it only cares about huge profit, so games are not judged in the merit of if they can sustain themselves, but on the merit of "if the money I give give more investment when in the bank or not".
This alone makes any and all NCSoft titles unsafe and impossible to predict, yes CoH might be thriving under players eyes and suddenly the plug be pulled just because NCSoft decided its better to put the money in the bank and collect investment instead.
That mentality will give short term money, but makes NCSofts reputation worse and worse.