| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Joystiq, and more

Reader Comments (6)

Posted: Oct 24th 2009 12:57AM Alpoe said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Ha, nice

Posted: Oct 24th 2009 2:26AM Mooncalled said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I wonder if they fixed Orion's timely firestorms right after the last enemy of the mob was killed...

That always cracked me up. I would be standing over the bleeding corpse and suddenly it would be raining fire.

Posted: Oct 24th 2009 6:08AM Minofan said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Nice writing! ^_^

Some welcome changes indeed, and the underworld story quests should advance on Monday.

Posted: Oct 24th 2009 8:35AM Tom in VA said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
The best thing they could do for Guild Wars is to allow players to use 7 Heroes at once -- permitting players to design their own skill bars. That is probably the only thing that would bring me back to this (great) game now.

Posted: Oct 24th 2009 11:52AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'm rather against 7 heroes; you can already steamroll most of the areas with the current 3 hero builds (Rac/Sab/Discordway, ect), so 7 heroes would just be ridiculous. Heroes were really only introduced so players could have better alternatives than henchies when they needed a few more party members and there weren't any human players available to fill the necessary roles. If Anet let us use 7 heroes, a lot of players would never bother grouping up with human players for anything short of elite hardmodes and Urgoz/Deep. Making it so its easier for players to avoid playing with each other is not something an online game needs imo.
Reply

Posted: Oct 25th 2009 3:31PM Agar said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Yeah the game is already easy with 3 heroes no need for 7. Plus you need one more good player to beat everything pve wise in game.

Featured Stories

Coming soon
Engadget

Engadget

Joystiq

Joystiq

WoW Insider

WoW

TUAW

TUAW