The most popular posts
in the last 7 days
- WoW loses another 100,000 subscribers 154 comments
- The Daily Grind: What's the highest sub fee you'd pay? 86 comments
- The Daily Grind: What dead game would you play in a second if it revived? 85 comments
- BioWare kicks off Star Wars: The Old Republic Q&A Fridays 76 comments
- Earthrise shutting down today 69 comments
Massively Speaking Podcast
Massively Speaking Episode 185: Bree-to-play
Latest episode: Tuesday, February 7th, 2012



Reader Comments (5)
Posted: Oct 14th 2009 9:14AM (Unverified) said
In my opinion.
Posted: Oct 14th 2009 9:58AM (Unverified) said
Yes I will give you it does feel a little bit clunky which I hope they iron out in future patches, BUT 'hastely put together' I have to disagree with that, Fallen Earth is a very good game, and I recommend people to really give it a shot!
Posted: Oct 14th 2009 10:15AM (Unverified) said
Posted: Oct 14th 2009 10:28AM (Unverified) said
Still I'd prefer to see SGW out rather than in perpetual Development. I think Fallen Earth has done that part well.
Posted: Oct 14th 2009 1:27PM Nintendesert said
That way at least another company can buy up the scraps and release it right.
Releasing an unfinished trashy product will only hurt the Stargate franchise and we may never see another Stargate game.
Just like Star Trek Online, it got picked up by a more experienced developer and will actually release. Until Beta starts, I can't say how good it is, but from what I read from people at PAX, it's looking pretty decent.
That's what we should hope for with Stargate. Not an AoC or a WWII Online.