The most popular posts
in the last 7 days
- WoW loses another 100,000 subscribers 152 comments
- The Daily Grind: What's the highest sub fee you'd pay? 85 comments
- BioWare kicks off Star Wars: The Old Republic Q&A Fridays 75 comments
- Earthrise shutting down today 69 comments
- The Daily Grind: What dead game would you play in a second if it revived? 62 comments
Massively Speaking Podcast
Massively Speaking Episode 185: Bree-to-play
Latest episode: Tuesday, February 7th, 2012



Reader Comments (1)
Posted: Oct 14th 2009 3:29AM (Unverified) said
i agree. CoH / CoV have a much better world design.
Honestly i was anticipating CO so much, i bought into all the hype. I pre-ordered it & bought it. I played the early beta, then the early launch then the full release even through the recent patches; hoping beyond hope that they would make it worth playing. But they never did.
I still find the graphics to feel more low res despite the newer engine & the color scheme still seems too raw & hostile to my eyes.
Not to mention the game is just a lot less fun. Grouping is infinitely harder, the mission system seems a lot more disconnected & the balance is waaaay out of wack.
CoH was better at launch than CO is now. and CoH is [b]WAAAAAY[/b] better now than CO is. I think if you took a group of people (who have never even heard of either game) and sat them in a room w/ both games they would say that CoH is the newer game & the better game.