The most popular posts
in the last 7 days
- WoW loses another 100,000 subscribers 156 comments
- The Daily Grind: What dead game would you play in a second if it revived? 108 comments
- The Daily Grind: What's the highest sub fee you'd pay? 86 comments
- BioWare kicks off Star Wars: The Old Republic Q&A Fridays 78 comments
- Earthrise shutting down today 69 comments
Massively Speaking Podcast
Massively Speaking Episode 185: Bree-to-play
Latest episode: Tuesday, February 7th, 2012



Reader Comments (1)
Posted: Oct 11th 2009 5:31PM Graill440 said
Ok , read up folks, this is the the example in realtime how devs screw up constantly, they simply refuse to do as their PAYING customers say. If you wanted an axample of the whining (as the devs put it) we are all doing because of ignorant dev choices, this is a prime example of what they want verse what the paying consumer wants, the example in its glory and as ignorant as can be.
quote]
"[We] would like to help the people who spend a few points wrong and want to fix those mistakes, not folks who want to rebuild their whole character.
endquote]
Who gives a squat devs, and how exactly are you helping?, your not paying for the game, in fact your jobs depend on keeping that sub. I'm sorry? you devs are independantly wealthy?
I understand now, you devs are still stuck on your "if the players have to redo a character they will have to pay to keep playing instead of getting insta fixed".
Devs your as ignorant as a lemming looking up that hill into sunshine, stupid as you ever were, still stuck on that pay-play-time model and you dont see the shear cliff, well you know its there, you just dont care. And we wonder why so many folks fail to sub to these games? A prime example of what not to do in progress.