Ship tiers and player progression were the topics of this week's dev chat for Star Trek Online and it yielded some pretty good results. Most of the new information clarifies some of the areas we were fuzzy on up until now. The piece of news we were super happy to see was the confirmation of DS9 and Quarks bar being in the game. Mmm, space gambling.
Getting to progression -- and away from gold pressed latinum -- the rate at which a player gains Bridge Officers should ensure that they always have enough to outfit any ship they're using. We also know that BOs get their own pool of skill points as you complete missions. Additionally, anyone worrying about 'nerfing' themselves as they level shouldn't have to, because the BOs a player brings on a ship will help balance out any missing essential skills for a ship type.
That being said, a science captain will always excel the most on a science vessel -- the system merely ensures that anyone can sufficiently fill a role if need be. There's plenty more in the transcript itself and we recommend anyone interested in Star Trek Online give it a look.
Reader Comments (10)
Posted: Oct 9th 2009 12:44PM agitatedandroid said
I hope for all our sakes that "BOs" doesn't catch on else these will be very smelly ships. I'm fine with "officers". There comes a point when internet short-hand laziness can take things a step too far.
Posted: Oct 9th 2009 12:53PM saintnicster said
The abbreviation used in the address to the webpage is "BOff". I think we should use that:P
Reply
Posted: Oct 9th 2009 9:45PM Anatidae said
So true. Like the fact that Bridge Officer is so hard to type. I can understand someone wanting to write MMO, but come on.
Although, Massively -1 for abbreviating in your article. As a journalist, you're better than some lazy developers and players who can't bother to type a few more letters.
Reply
Although, Massively -1 for abbreviating in your article. As a journalist, you're better than some lazy developers and players who can't bother to type a few more letters.
Posted: Oct 9th 2009 3:03PM (Unverified) said
I am really really really really looking forward to this game. It has so much potential, I think it could win the Nobel Peace Prize next year.
Posted: Oct 9th 2009 10:11PM (Unverified) said
The correct acronym for these officers in-game should be OOD which stands for Officer of the Deck.
Posted: Nov 24th 2009 3:23PM (Unverified) said
Except there can be only one OOD at any given time, and that spot is usually only used when in port.. the term Bridge Officers is actually quite correct, or they can also Use Officer of the Watch, if they are underway and there is only one on duty.
Reply
Posted: Oct 10th 2009 3:06PM pcgneurotic said
I'm surprised no one's mentioned the missing apostrophe in "Quarks bar" (twice). To the brig with you, Mr. Horner, and don't come out unless your BO's sorted too! ;)
Posted: Oct 10th 2009 3:53PM (Unverified) said
I've noticed it, but honestly I'm trying to live with the mistake so I don't make it again.
P.S.
(B)ridge (O)fficer(s)
BOs
Reply
P.S.
(B)ridge (O)fficer(s)
BOs
Posted: Oct 11th 2009 12:43PM pcgneurotic said
Ehhh, don't let it bother you unduly, the weight of your excellent STO reporting so far more than makes up for an errant apostrophe. In fact, it's probably a Klingon apostrophe, so it's there, but it's just cloaked. Scanning for neutron surges...








