The most popular posts
in the last 7 days
- WoW loses another 100,000 subscribers 156 comments
- The Daily Grind: What dead game would you play in a second if it revived? 102 comments
- The Daily Grind: What's the highest sub fee you'd pay? 86 comments
- BioWare kicks off Star Wars: The Old Republic Q&A Fridays 78 comments
- Earthrise shutting down today 69 comments
Massively Speaking Podcast
Massively Speaking Episode 185: Bree-to-play
Latest episode: Tuesday, February 7th, 2012



Reader Comments (8)
Posted: Aug 13th 2009 3:17PM (Unverified) said
Posted: Aug 13th 2009 7:47PM (Unverified) said
It takes almost no effort to find hordes of bots and campers. Most of the bots I've found in my casual shopping and exploring were in fact obvious bots--ruthed accounts with generic names in sequential order (usually with numerals in their name). At more than a few stores, the bots were actually NAMED "bot123" etc.
So to cite that bots no longer exist as a prominent user hour accumulator is just plain silly.
I've not found anything in the Abuse Reports dialog that points to specific "bot/camper" violations. Torley alluded to bot usage as a reportable offense, but I'm not sure if that is official or just his personal perspective.
Posted: Aug 13th 2009 8:02PM Joystiq Login Bugs SUCK said
Are you that surprised that T is lying?
Posted: Aug 13th 2009 8:35PM (Unverified) said
Nadine: As far as I know, it's an offense, but not a reportable one.
I don't believe T's lying to us. I'm sure the policies have had an impact and that that impact is ongoing, even if the enforcement rate for them remains less than 100%. I don't interpret him to be saying that bots are completely eliminated from the figures, by any means.
Some of them seem to be out of there (though I can't figure out quite where from), and that *is* having an effect on the figures. I think the usage-band data speaks for that. Has it got a ways to go? Sure.
Posted: Aug 13th 2009 8:57PM Joystiq Login Bugs SUCK said
There is no doubt that the Lab have removed just a small number of bots, that small number has had a sizable effect on user hours and concurrent logins (their steadfast number in the past that the platform was popular) yet there are seriously so many more bots in world.
85% of logins over 300 hours a month using non-SL clients and this being a pretty good indicator? That is what 36.5 million bot hours?
4,156 man years of bot camping per quarter.
Posted: Aug 13th 2009 9:25PM (Unverified) said
Posted: Aug 13th 2009 10:46PM Joystiq Login Bugs SUCK said
Yet Jack clearly said "You are using these in ways we don't allow (To live on)" and "You are running more scripts on them than we allow"
Katt said "Come and talk with M and Jack about your concerns" amongst other whoppers like "At no time were Kids banned from exhibiting" despite people like me having in their hands emails from Robin Linden saying that very thing. Again you defended her. Said she wasn't lying.
You called Katt one of the best communications managers around, yet she delighted in eating popcorn after she threw a dead rat in our bed to get her lulz.
Posted: Aug 13th 2009 11:04PM (Unverified) said