Twixt was one of those names on the Freedom server of City of Heroes that would just drive everyone nuts. He was a PvPer who would find some of the craziest ways to annoy the heck out of his opponents, such as teleporting them right in front of the Longbow agents at the hero base in PvP zones. A year ago, however, the man behind the keyboard finally drew back his mask to reveal a sociology professor from Loyola University outside New Orleans.
Now his study on City of Heroes/Villains is finally coming forward, revealing a controversial look at how defying the cultural rules of a population can turn a person into a social outcast. The study's goal was to play only by the developer's rules, ignoring any extra rules that might be created by the population. For example, the concept of "kill stealing" and "fair fights" are thrown out the window as they are created by the population, not the game. Think of it like EVE Online -- if the game allows it, he does it.
While the study is intriguing in the fact that it covers the "new frontiers" of virtual worlds, it also brings into question some of the ethics involved with working undercover in a population, such as causing undue stress via what we consider to be griefing.
For a full report, check out the story as reported by The Times-Picayune.
[Thanks Petterm, Scopique!]
Reader Comments (45)
Posted: Jul 9th 2009 5:22AM (Unverified) said
omg i played with this dude on city of heroes. he rarely talked and was really good.
Posted: Jul 9th 2009 12:35PM (Unverified) said
Why is this guy getting paid to try to discover that online societies that rise up inside of games have social mores? Sociology 101 teaches you that! And, just like in any society, ignoring the mores will not allow you to fit well into society!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mores
So, not only was he "acting like a jerk", he was purposefully ignoring the rules set up by the society. Of course people were pissed at him. The only thing that's remarkable about this whole thing was that he didn't know it would happen from the start.
Personally, I think he just likes being a jerk, and wanted to get paid to play an MMO and grief people. I hope the review board looks at this guy long and hard.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mores
So, not only was he "acting like a jerk", he was purposefully ignoring the rules set up by the society. Of course people were pissed at him. The only thing that's remarkable about this whole thing was that he didn't know it would happen from the start.
Personally, I think he just likes being a jerk, and wanted to get paid to play an MMO and grief people. I hope the review board looks at this guy long and hard.
Posted: Jul 10th 2009 3:09AM (Unverified) said
I don't feel like he understands the definition of "rules."
In the paper he insists that he is following the rules, and the other players are ignoring them, but it seems to me that that mischaracterizes the situation completely.
Instead what you have is players filling in areas that lack rules with their own rules. It is not against the rules to NOT PvP in a PvP area or to not use an unfair game tactic. You can choose not to and that's not "against the rules." The players aren't ignoring the rules they are simply making a choice not to do something in an area where it's allowed.
If I go into an area where walking on the grass is allowed, it's not breaking the rules to choose not to walk on the grass And if everyone who frequents the area mutually agrees to stay off the grass except for one person, then the person who chooses to walk on the grass isn't "following the rules." He is doing something that he is allowed to do, but there is no rule that he must do it.
His proposition that people "ignore rules" when they cause social harm is faulty then, because no one is ignoring any rules. There's no rule that says you must teleport people into the guard area and no rule that says you have to fight at all times in a PvP area. They are making up their own rules where they feel the current rules are lacking, not ignoring rules that are in place. And he is not "following rules" by playing in the way he did. He wasn't breaking them either, but there was no rule that he must act that way.
In the paper he insists that he is following the rules, and the other players are ignoring them, but it seems to me that that mischaracterizes the situation completely.
Instead what you have is players filling in areas that lack rules with their own rules. It is not against the rules to NOT PvP in a PvP area or to not use an unfair game tactic. You can choose not to and that's not "against the rules." The players aren't ignoring the rules they are simply making a choice not to do something in an area where it's allowed.
If I go into an area where walking on the grass is allowed, it's not breaking the rules to choose not to walk on the grass And if everyone who frequents the area mutually agrees to stay off the grass except for one person, then the person who chooses to walk on the grass isn't "following the rules." He is doing something that he is allowed to do, but there is no rule that he must do it.
His proposition that people "ignore rules" when they cause social harm is faulty then, because no one is ignoring any rules. There's no rule that says you must teleport people into the guard area and no rule that says you have to fight at all times in a PvP area. They are making up their own rules where they feel the current rules are lacking, not ignoring rules that are in place. And he is not "following rules" by playing in the way he did. He wasn't breaking them either, but there was no rule that he must act that way.
Posted: Jul 12th 2009 7:41AM (Unverified) said
Don't you all get it? He only offered this information so he could study you all going crazy over it again right here!...lol. Old goat.
Posted: Jul 16th 2009 3:37PM (Unverified) said
I played quite a bit with Twixt in zone. The guy spent so many hours it was ridiculous. I figured he was just a kid with social problems, until the "research paper" was released.
SG coalitionmates- or people from RV, where TWIXT pvp'ed knew this wasn't research.
He would sometimes get upset and talk trash to others, but left that out of his "research." He would spend a half-hour straight, teleporting people he couldn't beat to pill boxes, etc just to harass. He had social problems and was eventually kicked out of an in-game Super Group because of his social problems. He later claimed to be a victim and simple researcher, but that was after the fact.
He had basically every "time out" power he could get. And I still saw and helped beat him quite a bit. He would get frustrated and quit. That wasn't research. That was video game addiction.
He didn't log on for hours straight, doing everything considered socially disrespectful in the game, all for the sake of research. He called it research later, and tried to become famous off it.
Whatever people think about whether he should have or should not have acted as he did, the "experiment" and "research" were after the fact.
SG coalitionmates- or people from RV, where TWIXT pvp'ed knew this wasn't research.
He would sometimes get upset and talk trash to others, but left that out of his "research." He would spend a half-hour straight, teleporting people he couldn't beat to pill boxes, etc just to harass. He had social problems and was eventually kicked out of an in-game Super Group because of his social problems. He later claimed to be a victim and simple researcher, but that was after the fact.
He had basically every "time out" power he could get. And I still saw and helped beat him quite a bit. He would get frustrated and quit. That wasn't research. That was video game addiction.
He didn't log on for hours straight, doing everything considered socially disrespectful in the game, all for the sake of research. He called it research later, and tried to become famous off it.
Whatever people think about whether he should have or should not have acted as he did, the "experiment" and "research" were after the fact.







