The most popular posts
in the last 7 days
- WoW loses another 100,000 subscribers 156 comments
- The Daily Grind: What dead game would you play in a second if it revived? 110 comments
- The Daily Grind: What's the highest sub fee you'd pay? 86 comments
- BioWare kicks off Star Wars: The Old Republic Q&A Fridays 78 comments
- Earthrise shutting down today 69 comments
Massively Speaking Podcast
Massively Speaking Episode 185: Bree-to-play
Latest episode: Tuesday, February 7th, 2012



Reader Comments (2)
Posted: Jun 13th 2009 9:18PM Keen and Graev said
The method of obtaining these numbers (80/10/1, whatever) is not accurate. The numbers used themselves are not accurate. Thus, the result is even further from accurate. The premise of saying that most people won't pay and only a tiny % will is at best "probably accurate". However, trying to predict anything beyond that is a gross misrepresentation of even a "guesstimate".
Proof?
I'm one of those 3 million accounts and I haven't played since the first week. As ethereal.wolf said, you have to use the active users, not the total users, for this to make any sort of sense. This is like Turbine saying they had "800,000 characters playing LOTRO". Can you spot the half-truth there?
I think the best we can do is say "Free Realms is growing in registered users, I saw four commercials this morning while watching Ninja Turtles, the servers are still up, and Massively does a great job at giving them exposure. They must be doing okay."
Posted: Jun 14th 2009 9:43AM Holgranth said
Now I have nothing personal against Free Realms, I dislike the company, HATE microtransaction systems, but I don't have a hate on for the game itself.
It COULD become a "Mini-WoW" for all I know the BIG mmo in the Tweens dept. But untill we know actual subscriber numbers I think trying to guesstimate revenue off the fact that 3 million people have tried it is a little lame.