| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Joystiq, and more

Reader Comments (4)

Posted: May 18th 2009 11:40PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"the lack of rewards to offset the cost of losing ships in PvP"

Duh

Why would one want to fly their multi - million dollar ship into that just to get it destroyed so you can spend hours replacing it and get zero out of it?

Posted: May 19th 2009 7:45AM Brendan Drain said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Whether you agree with this or not, PvP in EVE is a lot of fun. PvP is essentially what the entire game is based around and if you've never given it a try, I suggest trying to get into it somehow. If you can keep the cost of your ships down, there really is no "grind" to pay for ships. A single level 4 mission can give out up to 30 million isk, which is equivalent to losing 20-30 fully insured tech 1 cruisers with tech 1 fittings or 4-5 with tech 2 fittings.

Faction Warfare is particularly good for getting into PvP because it's mostly small gang warfare with small ships. Disposable frigate fleets and destroyer gangs are a common sight.
Reply

Posted: May 19th 2009 4:43AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"These issues have even made it as far as the Council of Stellar Management."


Ooooo....What issue hasn't if you don't mind me asking?
Don't get me wrong, I agree that faction warfare needs some serious tweaking, but the CSM addresses pretty much every issue there is. That's their job :P

Posted: May 19th 2009 7:39AM Brendan Drain said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Issues only reach the voting stage with the CSM if they recieve significant support on the CSM Assembly Hall forum section. Additionally, CCP specifically requested information from the CSM on what could be done to improve Faction Warfare.
Reply

Featured Stories

Engadget

Engadget

Joystiq

Joystiq

WoW Insider

WoW

TUAW

TUAW