| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Joystiq, and more

Reader Comments (5)

Posted: May 11th 2009 1:54PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I am quite surprised. I know of a group of three sims that divested themselves of all bots (which regularly accounted for 150+ bots) , and sort of assumed most everyone else did the same. Yet I know of one place that clearly still has them, looking at it, and as you say, there must be others.

Perhaps the reduction of bots has been entirely voluntary so far, and the rest are waiting to see how effective LL is at tracking them down and giving them a slap on the wrist? I wish LL allowed users to submit AR's on the matter, to speed them along, but of course they specifically said that user ARs would not be welcome.
Reply

Posted: May 11th 2009 2:25PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Linden Labs is trying to simultaneously solve a huge number of major problems. From traffic bots, ad farms and adult content issues to ugly builds, griefer enforcement and technology issues. Lots of doubt as to whether they are prioritizing them correctly in terms of what their current customers need and want.
Reply

Posted: May 11th 2009 2:32PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Just as 16M parcels still go on the market for high prices despite a policy forbidding it, traffic bots will continue to be used. Some people will take the hint, others will chance it and find they can get away with it because LL don't have the resources or the will.
Reply

Posted: May 11th 2009 4:52PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
What policy?

I didn't even have to look to find bot plantations at the mega high traffic sites (http://www.adric.us/2009/05/10/gta-v-second-life/) where one would assume Linden would look first.
Reply

Posted: May 12th 2009 5:04PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Kind of expected.

Basically LL told us "we'll deal with it, we dont' want you to bug us with it."

Which is an easy way of saying 'complaining about traffic bots is none of your business, we'll deal with it when we're damned well ready'.

While they may have taken the high road in saying they would consider bots on a case by case basis, since there are uses for bots aside from spoofing traffic, traffic ITSELF has become an easily gamable social problem. Targeting cases one on one does not remove the incentive for people to create resource hogging environments purely for the sake of traffic. In fact, there really isn't much keeping a determined traffic abuser from creating scads more bot accounts and planting them back in their area once they've been dealt with the first time.

I have even seen services advertising the use of bots for this purpose, marketed towards business owners who don't have the resources.

Until LL can effectively cut out bot accounts from traffic or remove traffic entirely, I can see these problems continuing. Particularly in the realm of third party clients, being able to 'tell' a bot account from a real one is not as easy as one might think.
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

The Mog Log: Who mourns for Eorzea?

Posted on Feb 11th 2012 4:00PM

The Road to Mordor: Six wonders of the newbie world

Posted on Feb 11th 2012 12:00PM

Engadget

Joystiq

WoW

TUAW