My top two:

1. After further review, Taser's counsel decided they needed additional counsel on how to deal with the nuances of this issue and that counsel will come back with the recommended course of action in the not too distant future.

2. Someone on Taser's team spoke with someone on LL's team, had a quick chat and realized that this was probably going to drag and drag with no result or a result that would result with LL being slapped on the wrist.

Before I get mocked on possibility #2, not all lawyers are looking to jam up the docket just for a paycheck. Especially if two in-house counsel people get together. These types are very aware of the litigation budget and generally seek to avoid filing too many briefs.