Ah, I see the error. No. Testclient isn't copybot. It's certainly not the copybot to which most people refer. Copybot *did* include quite a bit of testclient's code, but that's not the same thing.
It's true that testclient has about as many content copying features as the SL viewer, but calling it copybot would be quite erroneous.
Reader Comments (1)
Posted: May 3rd 2009 11:27PM (Unverified) said
It's true that testclient has about as many content copying features as the SL viewer, but calling it copybot would be quite erroneous.