The most popular posts
in the last 7 days
- WoW loses another 100,000 subscribers 151 comments
- The Daily Grind: What's the highest sub fee you'd pay? 85 comments
- BioWare kicks off Star Wars: The Old Republic Q&A Fridays 71 comments
- Earthrise shutting down today 69 comments
- Star Trek Online unpacks Cardassian mystery boxes 60 comments
Massively Speaking Podcast
Massively Speaking Episode 185: Bree-to-play
Latest episode: Tuesday, February 7th, 2012



Reader Comments (1)
Posted: Apr 29th 2009 4:02PM Dblade said
So what if its done by one person? That's just a curiosity. One person can make an entire broadway play. So what if smaller companies can design mmo's? I'm not playing it because it only took 50 people to make, I'm playing it because the experience is good.
Indie-cred has nothing to do with that at all. In my experience, the more you focus on the indie aspect, the more its just a cover to excuse a poor or unpolished experience. If a game is good it can stand alone on its own merits, but most "indie" games are going to struggle in the same way DFO struggles, by simply not having enough manpower or resources to realize the vision of the developers and react to the demands of the playerbase.
Indie is more about the pose. there's nothing wrong with games having a small developer team or being made by a few people: the history of gaming is that the big dev teams are an aberration. But independent is just a meaningless label to people who enjoy games, or even film. It adds a lot of bunk subtext. It's not like a good game becomes any more because its independent, or a sucky game sucks less.
If love is a good idea, seek a publisher! Get it out to as many people as possible! So you can expand and maintain it easily and you have time to work on other projects. Screw indie-ness, if your experience is good it doesn't matter.