The most popular posts
in the last 7 days
- WoW loses another 100,000 subscribers 154 comments
- The Daily Grind: What dead game would you play in a second if it revived? 87 comments
- The Daily Grind: What's the highest sub fee you'd pay? 86 comments
- BioWare kicks off Star Wars: The Old Republic Q&A Fridays 76 comments
- Earthrise shutting down today 69 comments
Massively Speaking Podcast
Massively Speaking Episode 185: Bree-to-play
Latest episode: Tuesday, February 7th, 2012



Reader Comments (5)
Posted: Apr 28th 2009 10:48PM (Unverified) said
anyway, wouldn't those skins that are photos of real human bodies, or appear to be sampled from photos of real human bodies (but in some cases are completly "handmade") be considered photorealistic at least enough to be ARed ?
Posted: Apr 28th 2009 10:54PM (Unverified) said
And neither avatars, nor avatar skins come anywhere close to that lofty ideal.
Posted: Apr 28th 2009 11:08PM (Unverified) said
Posted: Apr 28th 2009 11:23PM (Unverified) said
Without clear definitions, we can argue until the cows come home (as they say) and still not have anything better than guesswork to show for it -- and that puts users of Second Life at risk of administrative sanctions, for acting in good-faith.
Posted: May 2nd 2009 2:03AM (Unverified) said