The most popular posts
in the last 7 days
- WoW loses another 100,000 subscribers 151 comments
- The Daily Grind: What's the highest sub fee you'd pay? 85 comments
- BioWare kicks off Star Wars: The Old Republic Q&A Fridays 72 comments
- Earthrise shutting down today 69 comments
- Star Trek Online unpacks Cardassian mystery boxes 60 comments
Massively Speaking Podcast
Massively Speaking Episode 185: Bree-to-play
Latest episode: Tuesday, February 7th, 2012



Reader Comments (1)
Posted: Apr 9th 2009 10:02AM Snow Leopard said
For example, the WoW developers have taken to heart the comments and complaints of their player base over the years and made their game more accessible in the process. They’ve reduced the prices of mounts, the time it takes to level, and the punishing difficulty of raids for all players who pay the same amount of money every month. Improvements to the game aren’t a luxury but a core part of the experience every participating player expects to receive.
The problem with microtransactons is that they are misleading in this regard, offering you a sub-par experience for free and then requiring you to pay more money piece-by-piece for the full, satisfying experience. This results in the dedicated players having to spend actual money to stay on top, and the players who wanted a free experience facing a game in which they are increasingly marginalized.
So, overall, we are left with a game where if you want to play for free you get a poor experience and where if you want a total experience you have to pay just as much if not more than a monthly a subscription would cost. How is this better than the current model?