| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Joystiq, and more

Reader Comments (14)

Posted: Mar 10th 2009 6:15PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Neat game... BUT... paying $20 for a horse to RENT? No thanks... that game should have never had a rent fee in the first place, they need to allow people to actually buy the horse with IN-GAME gold... don't force people to buy that with real money...

Posted: Mar 10th 2009 6:25PM Minofan said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I did find the game intriguing - though even through my Nvidia panel I couldn't get graphics anything like seen in the screenshots - but the real money rental system was probably the terminal turn-off.

As with Atlantica, I just cannot get my head around these item malls that rent out perks ; consumables make sense because at least they accelerate progress or allow permanent reselections, but making impulse "ooh, shiny !" buys evaporate after 30 days baffles me.
Reply

Posted: Mar 11th 2009 2:15PM Mr A said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
As has already been pointed out, you can rent horses for in-game gold, and it's about $20 if you want to buy one permanently.
Reply

Posted: Mar 10th 2009 6:19PM MrGutts said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
You can rent horses in game with gold, but you can't buy them.

Posted: Mar 10th 2009 7:00PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
you can buy the mounts outright for like 35 bucks in diamonds or whatever. Seems pretty steep unless your busy like me and ended up buying your epic flyer in wow...for like $85 bucks worth of gold....
Then again 20+ hours of dailys when you make $68 an hour is a freaking horrible use of resources.
Honestly I dont mind these f2p games, in the end I would probably spend the same amount.

Posted: Mar 10th 2009 7:43PM eggmanjr said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
its only about ten bucks for a horse, you can buy 1000 diamonds for 50 bucks and horses are currently selling for at 199 diamonds each.
Reply

Posted: Mar 10th 2009 10:29PM Lateris said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
No offense--I am sorry but anyone paying for items in a virtual game is making a huge mistake. I am being polite in regards to what I really want to say.

Posted: Mar 10th 2009 11:30PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
@Lateris:
Right. Because you *don't* pay for virtual items when you're paying a subscription hmm?
And you *don't* pay for virtual items when you buy a game in the first place hmm?

Allow me to be less polite than you; if an individual has a 'gaming budget', whether they spend that as subs, initial purchases, or item mall transactions - what the hell difference does it make, moron?
Reply

Posted: Mar 10th 2009 11:54PM Nadril said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Technically you're forking out $15/mo for whatever items you can find in a normal MMO, how is this different?
Reply

Posted: Mar 11th 2009 8:24AM MrGutts said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Each individual values their time different from one another.

If someone wants to waists hours upon hours grinding away to get a item like a horse, so be it.

If someone would rather pay it up front and not waist his or her time to get said horse so they can enjoy, then so be it.

But don't be judging other people on how they get to that point.
Reply

Posted: Mar 27th 2009 7:55AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
its only like 8 bucks to buy a horse,, which is 7 less than a month of Warcraft.
Reply

Posted: Mar 11th 2009 8:25AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
This is a good game. It's got everything about WoW, WAR, DDO, LOTRO and EQ2 that I like, plus steroids on those things. The problem comes down, for me, to the inequality of the US vs the EU game. The EU game is further along and gets a lot of love, a lot of deals, a lot of GM support on the forums. The US portion of the game, run by a sister company, has none of those things. Unfortunately, that will be the breaker for me. Luckily, I managed not to buy diamonds for my house thus far and I've managed to save a bit of money.

I hope someone takes a look at this game, sees all the things that are right about it, and makes it into a sub based sort of game without the cash shop.

I will definately miss my priest/rogue.

Posted: Mar 11th 2009 2:21PM Mr A said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'm not sure I quite understand this comment. It seems to me the game gets plenty of attention.

If this game went subscription based, I wouldn't play it anymore. Part of its charm is that its so high quality and yet still free-to-play, and it's much higher quality than other free to play games. Nothing against LotRO, I enjoyed it, but I canceled my subscription there because I'm actually enjoying this more.

Like others have alluded to, if I want to spend $5 a month on it I can, if I want to spend $5 every other month on it I can, or if I don't want to spend any money on it, I can. And if I do spend money on it, I can choose exactly what that money goes for and I'm supporting a game I enjoy.
Reply

Posted: Mar 11th 2009 9:07AM Saylah said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'm stoked about the Guild Castles. I'll probably join a larger guild to be able to take part in this stuff. I was going to do a small casual guild but we'd miss out on all these features and PVP options.

Subscriptions + box price is more than I've spent in ROM for the conveniences and things that make the game fun to me. Like others have said, people value their time differently. Spending hours grinding gold and doing dailies, I personally find a waste of my time, adds no valuable gaming experience, isn't fun and not what I call entertainment. We're all paying for virtual items so we should drop the holier than thou ideas. :-) Except that I'm in control of mine and don't pay anything when I'm not paying. i also won't have to go thru the annoyance of unsub/resub when I don't have time to play. It's win-win for me.

I'm enjoying myself very much in ROM.

Featured Stories

Coming soon
Engadget

Engadget

Joystiq

Joystiq

WoW Insider

WoW

TUAW

TUAW