| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Joystiq, and more

Reader Comments (7)

Posted: Feb 9th 2009 12:15PM Nolf said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
After 10 years of gaming I can honestly say I have never read one single EULA agreement. SO far no harm done but I'm aware of the fact that if I would try to bring some of the game companies to the court, they will pwn me hard :P

Posted: Feb 9th 2009 12:16PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"Don't cheat. Don't make RL money off our product. Don't tamper w/ the code. Play as intened."

I don't need to read any of them. I'm not looking to "Get one over" on them.

I think if players have a pretty decent morale compass, they don't need to worry. I don't. And in my decade of playing, I've never had problem 1.

Posted: Feb 9th 2009 2:38PM wjowski said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
No point in reading them considering they usually get laughed out of court.

Posted: Feb 9th 2009 3:53PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
what is a EULA is that somthing you eat =P anyways i have read a few over my course of gameing and most i can not understand period.

Posted: Feb 9th 2009 5:31PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I have read one or two EULAs. Usually I only read the one on the Closed/Open BETA of a game I play so I know what I can 'officially' say or not say about it. Though usually that is more in the NDA than the EULA.

As for the 'live' games I play... I think I have read them ONCE, when I first began playing... and usually my eyes glaze over and my head slumps down onto my chest somewhere around when all the CAPS start...

What we need is a requirement, by law, that while the legalese version is still accessible, a -plain english- SUMMARY version be present, with hyperlinks to the section of the legalese that it is a translation/summary of, and THAT is the one that you are agreeing to.

AND, if it changes, the summary needs to point that out clearly.

The players are NOT lawyers. And even the few that ARE, may not be the right SORT of lawyer to understand what they are agreeing to. Almost any case based on current EULA texts should be pushed to jury trial, as no jury in the land is going to be able to judge in favor of the EULA when reminded of one simple fact: They had to have a week of supporting evidence where they got trained and had translated for them before they could even know what they are meant to be considering.

Now, there ARE some exceptions out there, where sites have tried their best to get it broiled down into something properly readable by 'common man'. But it's RARE.

Posted: Feb 9th 2009 8:04PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I've read the NDAs for a couple of closed betas, one EULA carefully, and skimmed a couple others. I am operating under the assumption that anything truly draconian in these agreements will, under review, be found unenforceable. But perhaps that is just wishful thinking.

Posted: Feb 10th 2009 8:28AM Gemi said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I've read through the EULAs of each MMO I've played, but only read them rarely for other software. Basically I only read it when I'm suspicious of the company/software, but so far there hasn't been anything suspicious that I didn't expect beforehand. The only time I did decide not to install was when I read the EULA for PunkBuster. I decided that the game that it was with wasn't worth letting the company to copy anything from my computer and watch everything I do. Not that I'd have or do anything interesting, but I don't feel too comfortable with that.

Featured Stories

Betawatch: May 19 - 25, 2012

Posted on May 25th 2012 8:00PM

Coming soon
Engadget

Engadget

Joystiq

Joystiq

WoW Insider

WoW

TUAW

TUAW