The most popular posts
in the last 7 days
- WoW loses another 100,000 subscribers 150 comments
- The Daily Grind: What's the highest sub fee you'd pay? 85 comments
- Earthrise shutting down today 69 comments
- BioWare kicks off Star Wars: The Old Republic Q&A Fridays 67 comments
- Star Trek Online unpacks Cardassian mystery boxes 60 comments
Massively Speaking Podcast
Massively Speaking Episode 185: Bree-to-play
Latest episode: Tuesday, February 7th, 2012



Reader Comments (2)
Posted: Jan 17th 2009 8:25AM (Unverified) said
If you ask me this was a very stupid ploy even if it was for advertising. I Personally love Guild Wars and as a point will now never play a Worlds.com game or use a worlds.com product ever on principle. Where as before i would have tried their software if it looked good. The only reason i can think that they would WANT to do this is if they thought they could actually get some settlement money and then shut down the company so that the execs can retire on a big wad of cash that they (in my opinion) are attempting to STEAL from NCSoft. If this goes through the way that worlds.com wants i am instantly filling a patent that states a car is something that has doors, and engine wheels and can move people from point a to point b. And then Sueing that ass of Toyota, Ford, GM etc because as far as i can tell thats basically what has happened in this situation.
Posted: Jan 17th 2009 8:30AM (Unverified) said
Every hear of the RIM Blackberry? RIM was the worlds.com of that set of patent suits. They won, obviously.