The most popular posts
in the last 7 days
- WoW loses another 100,000 subscribers 151 comments
- The Daily Grind: What's the highest sub fee you'd pay? 85 comments
- BioWare kicks off Star Wars: The Old Republic Q&A Fridays 73 comments
- Earthrise shutting down today 69 comments
- Star Trek Online unpacks Cardassian mystery boxes 60 comments
Massively Speaking Podcast
Massively Speaking Episode 185: Bree-to-play
Latest episode: Tuesday, February 7th, 2012



Reader Comments (7)
Posted: Jan 2nd 2009 12:12PM (Unverified) said
------------------------------------
Are you kidding me? Both are important, but endgame is where most players will spend most of their time. Its the DESTINATION.
According to your logic, its the plane ride thas important, not the travel location.
EVERY SINGLE MMO with no endgame, or incomplete endgame has failed or done miserably. ASk yourself why that is so. WHy would anyone bother to play a game if they know the final destination is crap?
Your list stink fyi. There are plenty of things that need fixing, and you list very very few.
Posted: Jan 2nd 2009 1:49PM (Unverified) said
Posted: Jan 2nd 2009 2:37PM (Unverified) said
The argument can certainly be made that the most popular MMO ever has a complex endgame that involves raiding, but it wasn't always like that by any means. The initial player base for WoW was built on a game that had, as you put it, "an incomplete endgame." The Molten Core was all Wow Had to offer until about nine months after the game came out. Last time I checked, that lack of endgame content doesn't seem to have hurt their numbers during those first nine months.
Posted: Jan 3rd 2009 11:13AM ultimateq said
And I also hate running around 50 zones to level up with quests. Learning the dynamics of each zone, where you can run and where you can't run. Dying along the way. Find me a nice spot where I can sit and kill loads of creatures. But I can understand why some people would dislike that method of leveling. Games that appeal to both sides work best.
So I agree with tbone, Endgame is more important than leveling content.
Posted: Jan 3rd 2009 5:00PM (Unverified) said
It would have if Blizzard hadn't added more endgame content. Molten Core was able to keep their attention for so long because it was still an enigma, and World of Warcraft didn't really have much competition at the time, just Everquest II and Lineage 2 really.
Posted: Jan 5th 2009 1:14PM ttvp said
"The Molten Core was all Wow Had to offer until about nine months after the game came out."
I hate to disagree with you, because you make a lot of solid points, but Warcraft had a little more than Molten Core at launch as far as level cap content is concerned. There was also Scholomance, Stratholme (2 parts), Blackrock Depths (arguable). Lower Blackrock Spire, and Upper Blackrock Spire. All of which I believe were initially 10/15 man raids when they were conceived. Yes Molten Core was top-tier raiding, but the other raid dungeons were formidable back then. Just because they're castrated shells of their former selves nowadays that can easily be soloed or done with less than 5 people doesn't make their existence any less significant.
Sorry but I had to take issue with that one thing you said. Everything else is spot on.
Posted: Jan 5th 2009 1:41PM ttvp said