| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Joystiq, and more

Reader Comments (6)

Posted: Aug 18th 2009 2:15AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
This is either madness or brilliance.

It's remarkable how often those two shreds coincide.

Posted: Dec 18th 2008 3:56PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
At best this story will be totally aborted into something that will see it's only exposure on the SciFi channel.

The problem with this story is there is no hero or villan that we can latch onto as identifiable in a positive way; or even endearing. Now, if they turned his SL gf into some sort of stalker and have him see the err of his ways and save his family (think Hackers meets Basic Instinct) they may have something. But as written, this is boring.

Another issue is public perception of the virtual world dooming this from the start. While I have met some very attractive people online, producers will have a real dillema here. How do you cast this year's Scarlett Johannson and whoever her hot male equivalent is these days in the leading roles without people shaking their heads muttering, "These people live in a fantasy world, why?" They could ugly up the cast but then you lose the geeks that may actually go to see this.

Dwight Shelford is the only SL avatar that made a successful appearance in mainstream media.

Posted: Dec 18th 2008 10:22PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Should be a compelling yarn. More titilating make-a-buck crap for the masses, I betcha.

As an aside, who are the "We", as in "we're quite fond..." and "We're interested to see...".

How may of you are there, or should we address you as "Your Majesty"?

Posted: Dec 18th 2008 11:41PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
'We' refers to the staff here at Massively. We frequently discuss all sorts of things around the office, and when 'we' have an aggregate opinion, 'we' mention it :) Not all the opinions and views are necessarily those of the individual writer.

You'll notice that there's a distinction above between we and me (fifth paragraph) - that's where I'm speaking for myself, rather than for us as a group.

Not every one of us participates in every discussion - we'd hardly have time to do anything else if that were so - but generally opinions aggregate between about three and about a dozen of us.
Reply

Posted: Dec 19th 2008 1:08AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Thanks for the clarification, and I'm glad to hear there is not more than one personality inside you. Being as you are Aussie, I hope and suspect you wouldn't identify too closely with the Monarchy, either. :)

btw, Are your office group discussions virtual, or do you all share a cramped, dingy, smoke-filled newsroom with plastic avatar collector models? Now there's a novel idea for a film setting.
Reply

Posted: Dec 19th 2008 3:17AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Well, we like to imagine that our office is all that. It is pretty much entirely virtual. Oh, there's some accounts and advertising people and the army of undead zombie lawyers - they have actual buildings (the walls keep them from contaminating the general public), but the rest of us are scattered all over the globe.

Besides - would *you* want to share a physical office with the Turpster? ;)
Reply

Featured Stories

WRUP: Kingdoms of Amalur was pretty cool edition

Posted on May 26th 2012 10:00AM

Betawatch: May 19 - 25, 2012

Posted on May 25th 2012 8:00PM

Coming soon
Engadget

Engadget

Joystiq

Joystiq

WoW Insider

WoW

TUAW

TUAW