| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Joystiq, and more

Reader Comments (2)

Posted: Dec 18th 2008 5:38PM Ingrod said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Seeing his examples I decided that the article autor is not a MMO hopper instead is a moron, if he cant see MMO goals other that buy a mount or reach the next level zone he have a very narrow vision of MMOs. We need more sandbox MMOs with diversified and clear goals, but say that the only WAR goal is buy a mount is pure blindness, conquer enemy capital is not a goal? Have the bests ships in PotBS is not a goal?

Personally hate the "leveling mentality" and MMO worlds build around level zones. Instead of play a rich world with many differents regions and inhabitants, we repeat the same actions zone after zone, the only difference from a level 1 map to a level 80 map is the mobs level, that is boring.
Reply

Posted: Dec 22nd 2008 5:02PM Mabuti said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
In defense of the author, WAR has great promise but the scenario's have ruined OPvP so the capture the capitol theory is just that, a theory. With adjustments to the game it could become a dominate MMO but until that opens up it is just a scenario based grinder. This is of course IMO.

-Flame on!
Reply

Massively Speaking Podcast

Massively Speaking Episode 185: Bree-to-play

Latest episode: Tuesday, February 7th, 2012

Engadget

Joystiq

WoW

TUAW