| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Joystiq, and more

Reader Comments (2)

Posted: Dec 12th 2008 8:04AM Abriael said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
As I said elsewhere, MTs are ok when people aren't asked to pay a monthly fee. It's a very viable way to fund a game without burdenin g casual players (even if anyone that's little more than casual ends up often spending more than a monthly fee, the comparison with CCG isn't definately a wrong one.

It becomes MUCH less ok when they become a further way to milk players on top of the monthly fee, like WoW's appearence/gender changes and SOE's EQ's E-walmart. That's basically an excuse to make people pay additional money for content/services that should most definately be part of the monthly fee itself.


Until now there has been a clear divide between P2P games and F2P games, bastardizing the payment method definately isn't good for us cunsomers, expecially if it becomes widespread in the industry.
Reply

Posted: Dec 12th 2008 11:54AM Tanek said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
And, as I said elsewhere, no matter what you think of microtransactions, how exactly is WoW's new gender change option something that should be part of the monthly fee? How is it necessary to your game at all? How does it give anyone an advantage?
Reply

Massively Speaking Podcast

Massively Speaking Episode 185: Bree-to-play

Latest episode: Tuesday, February 7th, 2012

Engadget

Joystiq

WoW

TUAW