| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Joystiq, and more

Reader Comments (8)

Posted: Dec 12th 2008 7:33AM MrGutts said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
This whole MT issue is going to be one of those things that people are split down the middle on, in the U.S., for the majority.

We are going to have to agree to disagree on it..

Me Personally I think MT's will be a good thing the way the U.S. economy is going (gone) into the crapper. It will give players move flexibility for paying.

I think we should give it a chance at least before we RAKE EA over the coals/tar/feathers/lashing with salt..

Posted: Dec 12th 2008 7:50AM Abriael said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
MTs are ok when people aren't asked to pay a monthly fee. It's a very viable way to fund a game without burdenin g casual players (even if anyone that's little more than casual ends up often spending more than a monthly fee, the comparison with CCG isn't definately a wrong one.

It becomes MUCH less ok when they become a further way to milk players on top of the monthly fee, like WoW's appearence/gender changes and SOE's EQ's E-walmart. That's basically an excuse to make people pay additional money for content/services that should most definately be part of the monthly fee itself. Until now there has been a clear division between P2P games and F2P games, bastardizing the payment method definately isn't good for us cunsomers, expecially if it becomes widespread in the industry.

Posted: Dec 12th 2008 10:42AM Tanek said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
"like WoW's appearence/gender changes"

Why, exactly, should this be part of the monthly fee? I certainly don't see it as a necessary part of gameplay. If people think the cost is worth it for a bit of plastic surgery for their character, fine. If they think the cost is too high, still fine. But to say it should be part of the monthly fee is, I think, asking a little much.

As for SOE, I left EQ2 for reasons more related to them than to gameplay, so I'm not going to jump in to defend them. The items I have seen that they offer in this way don't seem gamebreaking yet, though. I'd have to see where they take it to really make a judgment.
Reply

Posted: Dec 12th 2008 8:12AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
with exception to Server Transfers and Name changes,

I dont think Cash transactions belong in Pay to Play games


should be able to use only ingame cash, quests, special events to get fluff items or ingame perks

Posted: Dec 12th 2008 8:36AM Ves said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Don't forget Home

Posted: Dec 12th 2008 10:38AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
God, I wish people would stop using terms like "milk" and "force" to talk about selling a few cash shop items.

No one is forcing anyone to do anything.

No one is taking away anything.

They are selling fluffy fun items that, like any other item in any other game, has no affect on anyone BUT the player that buys them or uses them.

No cash shop has ever sold the LEETEST of the phat lewt in their cash shop.

People that are upset about this have no idea what they are talking about, have never USED a cash shop or have never experienced a cash shop.

The only controversy here stems from some people getting upset over fluff pets and XP pots. There is nothing more to it.

No one is going to cancel their subs over this..if they do they were just waiting for a reason.

The games are not going to lose anything over this, subs OR cash...actually they will make MORE money.

I wonder how someone deals with real life that has issues with this.

Posted: Dec 12th 2008 12:05PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I'm not against it, depending on *>how

Posted: Dec 12th 2008 12:45PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
My main concern is not where things stand today but where they are heading. If they find they can get people to pay for fluff items then they will have no reason to include them as part of the $14.95 a month we already pay.

So the value of the game drops as all new weapons and armor suddenly look basicly the same. But hey spend $1 per item to make them look good. Just don't think about how in the past games were expected to make new weapons and armor look better then old ones and not charge you more.

And lets face it once they realize they can make money off fluff items its only a small step to selling items that give you small bonuses. Then from there to bigger bonuses then from there to better items.

Before you know it in order to compete you will be required to pay your $14.95 a month and spend $20 a month in what once was fluff.

Don't believe it can happen? Look at what we put up with from cell phone companys. They will milk us for every dime they can get, and if we want to stop it we have to act now while these ideas are young.

Featured Stories

Betawatch: May 19 - 25, 2012

Posted on May 25th 2012 8:00PM

Coming soon
Engadget

Engadget

Joystiq

Joystiq

WoW Insider

WoW

TUAW

TUAW