| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Joystiq, and more

Reader Comments (8)

Posted: Dec 12th 2008 1:18PM (Unverified) said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
Smedley is and always will be a slick silver-tongued liar. They released this w/o telling players it was coming because they knew it was going to be a crap-storm and very unpopular. They just don't "get" why they aren't the top company any more. Its this kind of crap that is the reason.

Posted: Dec 12th 2008 1:26PM Froid said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
In the beginning EQ2 was a nice immersive escape into a wonderful fantasy world. Real world and non-game related intrusions were minimal.

LoN came out and there was a card game within the game. Not a big deal...except for the SPAM messages from the System Admins for every weekend tournament in LoN over and over and over again. And there was no OPTING out.

Now this...the real world sneaking into the game again, where you can spend money to get things within the game. Everytime you see some cool armor on someone else now...is it the result of some epic adventure that character did? Or did he just swipe his visa card? Did he work hard and quest and level and just DING? Or should you congratulate him by saying CHA-CHING?

And how long until more governments start taxing the in game purchases too? Massively seems to think it's coming.

Too many real world intrusions into my nice little fantasy world. Well...it WAS mine. It is not any longer.

Posted: Dec 12th 2008 1:27PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
"I also believe firmly that this will eventually get rid of farming and those things. Or at least it will drastically decrease it. Here's a good example why: Instead of paying some power leveler, buying an experience potion lets you do it yourself a lot faster. Where's the harm in that? That's our thought on it."

The integrity of the game is the "harm", you git.

Listen to this guy. He's the prime example of why MMO innovation is completely stagnant now.

The real solution to the problem of experience levels and power leveling is a game design issue. Make a game that is fun to play for years *without* measuring characters by levels and then you have really achieved something.

But this? No. This isn't a harmless solution. This is a business decision, pure a simple. The only benefit is that SOE makes more money. It's obvious that Smed doesn't give a shit about the integrity of the game.

Furthermore, I predict closures of SWG and Vanguard in 09. That would be the only reason this piece of crap system wasn't implemented for those games.

Posted: Dec 12th 2008 4:50PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I think the most interesting thing in that entire article was his mention of "future everquest games", like they already have the payment model chosen for it.
It might actually be pretty far down the development cycle.

Posted: Dec 12th 2008 6:49PM Mr Angry said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
The sad thing about this is that it's not even about gaming for this guy anymore, it's just about the money.

Players really need to read stuff like this before buying games. I'm sure there is a legal issue with ownership of virtual items coming up in the near future, I'm sure SOE wanted to get the jump on that. before these items become taxable.

As for the vocal minority on a few websites, I really hope that includes me, and I hope my arguments have been convincing enough that they stick out as being particularly negative, because that was my intention. I was the vocal minority on SWG too, and that was 90% of the customer base over 6 months.

I've discussed yesterday how a successor to Everquest (but not formally called Everquest 3) is 1 1/2 to 2 years into production (of a 4-5 year cycle), apparently someone at SOE just can't keep their mouth shut :)

The new cool stuff, is stuff we've already paid for with subs for SOE staff's development time, sold back to us at a premium. This is reinforced as he also mentions that there were no additional development staff working on the release items but might be in the future.

If SOE is really so focused on the competition (speed of roll out question) and not their present or future customers, it really exposes how shallow the depth of talent in management is right now to not realize the business priorities.

Now this is in place, do SOE support player maintained auctions on places like Ebay, fuck no, they took all those down claiming issues with ownership of virtual goods. Looks so convenient now that SOE have their own system in place, selling stuff that players have already paid for the development, calling them fluff to diffuse the most vehement reactions.

I gave Mr Smedley a second chance after the NGE, but now, I guess I was right, he's just a money grabbing cockmuncher.

Posted: Dec 16th 2008 4:54AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Here is the web address to "feedback thread" in the official Everquest 2 forums:

http://forums.station.sony.com/eq2/posts/list.m?&topic_id=438341

Smedley said those against this are a minority, yet reading those posts (yes, I have actually read them all in a belief SOE will actually remove this) I would guess that at least 75% of the people who have posted are against this in some way. How exactly is that the minority? /confused

Posted: Jan 13th 2009 10:25AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
I was a long term player of EQ - nearly 9 years. I cancelled my account the day after Station Cash was implemented. Smedhead is a complete idiot. If I was Howard Stringer I would be asking him why with all the MMORPGS that SoE have on their books, they still have less subscribers than 1 game - World of Warcraft.

He just does not get the depth of feeling against Station Cash and continues to put spin on it. The man appears to have no morals.

Posted: Jan 14th 2009 6:59AM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
Its excessively obvious this person is completely out of touch with the community, and his sole focus is getting as much cash out of EQ short term as possible, despite ruining the games integrity & driving away long term loyal customers en masse.

I doubt anyone could do worse PR for a game then this, even if they tried.

Does he even read his own forums ? I guess he'd need an account for that.

Not like any other SoE games every approached the succes EQ 1 was & still is population wise, either. So all his grand ideas, well, nothing but failure.

Maybe if he actually had a slight clue, from reading his own forums or mass feedback, he wouldn't come across as such an incompetent moneygrabing cock, and people would be inclined to buy his games, rather then actively downplay them.

I'll enjoy boycotting future SoE games, along with Jhon. Both are horrible.

Featured Stories

Betawatch: May 19 - 25, 2012

Posted on May 25th 2012 8:00PM

Coming soon
Engadget

Engadget

Joystiq

Joystiq

WoW Insider

WoW

TUAW

TUAW