The most popular posts
in the last 7 days
- WoW loses another 100,000 subscribers 152 comments
- The Daily Grind: What's the highest sub fee you'd pay? 86 comments
- BioWare kicks off Star Wars: The Old Republic Q&A Fridays 76 comments
- Earthrise shutting down today 69 comments
- The Daily Grind: What dead game would you play in a second if it revived? 67 comments
Massively Speaking Podcast
Massively Speaking Episode 185: Bree-to-play
Latest episode: Tuesday, February 7th, 2012



Reader Comments (6)
Posted: Dec 4th 2008 7:47AM (Unverified) said
Posted: Dec 4th 2008 7:51AM Temko said
Posted: Dec 4th 2008 12:17PM (Unverified) said
Posted: Dec 4th 2008 12:40PM (Unverified) said
Who gives a flaming rats ass how WoW was *over four years ago*? Warhammer and the like are competing with WoW *now*, not four years ago. The age of half-assed launches and patching-to-perfection are over now that WoW has become the 800-lbs gorilla sitting in the corner of the room waiting to stomp a hole in any new challenge.
The sooner people stop making excuses for crap like this, the better off we'll all be.
Posted: Dec 4th 2008 12:42PM (Unverified) said
I distinctly remember being in a beta for Warhammer. I really do! It just.... doesn't ever look like they fixed anything from then.
Posted: Dec 4th 2008 2:28PM Idle said
By comparison, WAR seems to be much more nimble in responding to user complaints and requests. They seem intent on fleshing the game out in a responsible manner and doing so in a short time frame.
Some of the changes that are coming around in WAR would take a year in WoW. It would be nice if things were perfect from the start, but that's hardly realistic. The games, as well as the players, are quite different so nailing down features and functionality based on the WoW template probably wouldn't be smart.
Mythic takes their game and the player experience seriously, it seems. They're also fast on their feet once they realize a change needs to be made. That makes me happy.