| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Joystiq, and more

Reader Comments (4)

Posted: Nov 24th 2008 3:21PM TheJackman said

  • Half a heart
  • Report
PQs and Keep captures and so on do get boring real quick the contribution system most of the time did look unfair to me so I got sick of them real quick . I make it to the cap level... And like the game does mostly have only boring pvp endgame I dropped it 2 months ago 2 days before my free month was complete. (I do hate pvp and did buy it for the pve content what a mistake that was). Big disappointment !!!

Now playing Warcraft Wotlk.... Blizzard did deliver on that one the people already 80 just rusting there is so much content in Wotlk I think even more them in the complete Warhammer game... I am not a fanboy but its true that blizzard does deliver and in its 4 years live time no other mmo was even near so good and easy to pick up as World of warcraft was and is today.
Reply

Posted: Nov 24th 2008 3:44PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
This guy, Jack, never gives up. Whenever there is a chance to slam WAR (and any other MMOG, for that matter) and praise WoW, he's there. I sincerely hope Blizzard recognizes his efforts and rewards him well --because he deserves it!
Reply

Posted: Nov 24th 2008 4:19PM (Unverified) said

  • 2.5 hearts
  • Report
Bullspit you're not a fanboy. In the other artical earlier about Slow and Steady you blather on about how WotLK is the "best expansion for an MMO ever" and go on to say:

""""You can better talk more about the slow development cycle and rush jobs of other mmo's. Games like Warhammer, LOTR, AOC that still not are 100% stable and have bugs and still not are patch out. And where the hell are the other city's of Warhammer??""""

First off, LOTRO is very stable and a great game right now (just released their 1st expansion). AoC I must agree is crap, but that has to do with Funcom's incompetance. Warhammer Online may not be 100% stable, but it's only freakin' 2 and 1/2 months old. It is stable on higher-end PCs and is being optimised for lower-end PCs (a new patch Saturday improved it even more so). And, if you're kept up to date on things, you'd know that the other cities were cut during beta because of a design flaw and 'might' be introduced later but most likely will not.

To point out something: WoW said hero classes in it's beta prior to launch in 2004...it's 2008 and they finally get in their late hero class (singular). Siege warfare was announced in WoW's beta, and is just now getting into the game,....4 years later.


As for your comment above on how "I am not a fanboy but its true that blizzard does deliver":

Where's the Lich King raid that's supposed to be in? Oh, that's right, the KEY feature of WotLK is not yet in-game. Just like how for TBC they didn't have Arenas or the Black Temple in-game until a month or 3 after it's launch. That isn't adding in content, or stretching it...that's called "bait-n'-switch". All they're doing is making sure that their subscribers keep paying month after month so that they can touch the promised content.

As for you trying WAR and not liking that, I doubt you even tried it. But, if you did, ...why did you go into a PvP game expecting strong PvE to play? That's like going into a McDonald's and expecting a taco; it's just not going to happen.

P.S. Work on your English, your fanboy age is showing.
Reply

Posted: Nov 24th 2008 4:57PM Idle said

  • 3 hearts
  • Report
You played two days shy of your free month and you are slamming the end game? You are the man if you can reach max level and soak in the entire end game in 28 days.
Reply

Massively Speaking Podcast

Massively Speaking Episode 185: Bree-to-play

Latest episode: Tuesday, February 7th, 2012

Engadget

Joystiq

WoW

TUAW