| Mail |
You might also like: WoW Insider, Joystiq, and more

Reader Comments (2)

Posted: Nov 24th 2008 11:38PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
As a fan of the SLART case, I'm proud to have the first comment! WOOO!!! can't wait to post something on Virtually Blind too. As I've said before, my personal take is that LL needs to apply RL law, and they do the best they can... they just try to comply when they can, and then hopefully have some time to focus on making SL better.

A year of Bragg, and now a year of SLART... it's just LAAAAAAAAG.
Reply

Posted: Nov 25th 2008 3:44PM (Unverified) said

  • 2 hearts
  • Report
You would think the TOS would be superceded by an order from the bench but it appears as if Linden Labs has decided to treat this as they do any other infraction that they act upon. They do need to be careful as their selectivity is going to bite them not just on trademark issues but on issues related to situations like kiddie porn and gambling.

Demonstrating selective control of their empire by enforcing perceived illegalities related to their brand and not what most of us would perceive as substantially more serious makes them appear complicit in engaging in those activities. Can you say RICO?
Reply
Sorry, you must be logged in to leave a comment.

Featured Stories

Earthrise shutting down today

Posted on Feb 9th 2012 7:00AM

Engadget

Joystiq

WoW

TUAW